2016
DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current therapeutic strategies for advanced pancreatic cancer: A review for clinicians

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer (PC) would become the second leading cause of cancer death in the near future, despite representing only 3% of new cancer diagnosis. Survival improvement will come from a better knowledge of risk factors, earlier diagnosis, better integration of locoregional and systemic therapies, as well as the development of more efficacious drugs rising from a deeper understanding of disease biology. For patients with unresectable, non-metastatic disease, combined strategies encompassing primary chemother… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
62
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
62
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The best chance of survival is by surgical resection (2,3) although the chilling reality is that a curative surgical resection (i.e., negative margins or R0) is only possible in a fifth of patients of whom only 20% are alive at 5 years (4). Despite this, a surgery-first approach remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for only a minority of patients with resectable disease because resection has become more safe (5) and effective systemic treatments are still awaited (6). It is no surprise that in the drive to achieve better results some surgeons advocate more radical surgery to treat more patients (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best chance of survival is by surgical resection (2,3) although the chilling reality is that a curative surgical resection (i.e., negative margins or R0) is only possible in a fifth of patients of whom only 20% are alive at 5 years (4). Despite this, a surgery-first approach remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for only a minority of patients with resectable disease because resection has become more safe (5) and effective systemic treatments are still awaited (6). It is no surprise that in the drive to achieve better results some surgeons advocate more radical surgery to treat more patients (7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both sexes, there has been a steady increase in incidence over the past 20 years [3,5]. The dismal outlook of this disease is mostly due to the majority (~80 %) of patients being diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, with severe cachexia and poor metabolic status rapidly contributing to morbidity and mortality [6]. Currently, there is no effective screening and no early detection method available to diagnose PDAC at a pre-malignant stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no effective screening and no early detection method available to diagnose PDAC at a pre-malignant stage. Although surgery to remove pancreatic tumours offers the best chance for survival, only a minority (10-15 %) of patients can undergo curative operation at the time of diagnosis [6]. Even after surgery, the overall 5-year survival rate is less than 4% mainly because micrometastases will already have been established, eventually leading to local and/or systemic recurrence [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Стандартом лечения больных с неоперабельным РПЖ является монохимиотерапия гемцитабином, но при этом частота ответа составляет лишь 5-15% [5,11]. Попытки комбинации гемцитабина с оксалиплатином, другими цитостатиками или таргетными препаратами не показали значительного улучшения результатов: медиана выживаемости больных составляет менее 6 мес, а однолетняя выживаемость -менее 18% [9,14,15].…”
unclassified