Current trend in treatment of glioblastoma in Japan: a national survey using the diagnostic procedure combination database (J-ASPECT study-glioblastoma)

Abstract

Background In the treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), treatment modalities, such as bevacizumab (BEV) and carmustine wafers implants have been approved in Japan since 2013. However, it is unclear whether such a trend in treatment complexity can accelerate treatment centralization. The aim of this study was to reveal the current trend in the treatment of GBM in Japan. Methods We used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) database to analyze the data of 1,774 patients from 305 institutions between April 2016 and March 2019. To analyze the situations associated with first-line BEV use during concurrent TMZ (temozolomide)-radiotherapy, we compared TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups. Results Of the 1,774 patients with GBM, tumor removal by craniotomy was performed in 1,572 (88.6%) patients, and stereotactic biopsy was performed in 156 (8.8%) patients. A total of 1,229 (69.3%) patients underwent radiotherapy, and 1,287 (72.5%) patients underwent chemotherapy. TMZ alone was administered to 878 (68.2%) and TMZ combined with BEV in 381 (29.6%) patients. In the TMZ–BEV group, as compared to the TMZ-alone group, the rate of discharge to home was significantly lower (P = 0.0044), and the rate of stereotactic biopsy was significantly higher (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed in the distribution of patients between the TMZ alone and TMZ–BEV groups depending on the scale of institution (P = 0.1240). Conclusion First-line BEV administration seems to be selected properly regardless of the institutional scale. This Japan-wide study of GBM treatment revealed that high level and newly introduced treatments have been steadily generalized in Japanese institutions.

Volumetric study reveals the relationship between outcome and early radiographic response during bevacizumab-containing chemoradiotherapy for unresectable glioblastoma

“…Thereafter, Japanese institutes, including ours, have launched several real-world studies, which indicate the clinical benefits of optional first-line BEV for patients with severe clinical conditions [1,[6][7][8][9][10]. Practically, we selected first-line BEV for patients with unresectable GBM and accumulated the clinical data [11]. These case series revealed that the radiographic course following first-line BEV for unresectable tumors varied among patients, and its outcome was considered an unresolved issue that needs to be addressed.…”

Volumetric Study Reveals the Relationship Between Outcome and Early Radiographic Response During Bevacizumab-Containing Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Glioblastoma

“…Thereafter, Japanese institutes, including ours, have launched several real-world studies, which indicate the clinical bene ts of optional rst-line BEV for patients with severe clinical conditions [1,[6][7][8][9][10]. Practically, we selected rst-line BEV for patients with unresectable GBM and accumulated the clinical data [11]. These case series revealed that the radiographic course following rst-line BEV for unresectable tumors varied among patients, and its outcome was considered an unresolved issue that needs to be addressed.…”