Current Trends and Future Direction of Cognitive Assessment Tools in Brain lesion disorder : Adult Occupational Therapists

Kang, Ji-Seon; Kim, Sieun; Yeong-Ae, Yang

doi:10.34263/jsotad.2019.13.1.63

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Cognitive function. Cognitive function was measured using the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE; Kang et al, 1997Kang et al, , 2019 and the limitations in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). According to this combined method, the cognitive function of the participants was rescored as follows: 1 (normal), 2 (moderately impaired), and 3 (severely impaired).…”

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The maximum sum score is 30; scores between 24 and 30 indicate normal cognition. Scores between 20 and 23 indicate mild cognitive impairment, and scores lower than 19 indicate dementia (Kang et al, 1997(Kang et al, , 2019. While the screening tool demonstrates high sensitivity when measuring severely impaired cognitive function, it cannot accurately measure mild cognitive decline because of its measurement error (Kang et al, 1997).…”

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association Between Social Participation and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Adults

Park

Downer

Nam

et al. 2022

OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social participation is associated with cognitive function; however, their causal relationships have not been reported yet. This study was designed to examine the autoregressive effects and bidirectional causal relationship between social participation and cognitive function. In this secondary longitudinal data analysis, we enrolled 4,834 Korean adults. A cross-lagged panel model with fixed effects was used to examine the causal relationships between social participation and cognitive function. Both participation (unstandardized coefficient = .370, p < .001) and cognitive function (unstandardized coefficient = .151, p < .001) had positive autoregressive effects over time. Participation had a cross-lagged effect on cognitive function (unstandardized coefficient = .061, p < .001). However, the cross-lagged effects of cognitive function on participation were not statistically significant (unstandardized coefficient = .051, p = .312). Various health-care programs that promote social participation and improve cognitive function must be established. Additional studies are required to confirm the causal effects of cognitive function on participation.

show abstract

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%