Summary: Leucine influx into six brain regions was de termined in anesthetized rats with the in situ brain per fusion technique using either saline or plasma perfusate.This technique has several advantages over other methods such as the brain uptake index (BUI) technique.The concentration dependence of L-Ieucine influx was best described by a model with a saturable and a nonsat urable component. For the saturable component, Villa, equaled 10,67 ± 0.21 x 10-4 fLmol S-l g I and Kill equaled 0.0257 ± 0.0009 fLmol ml-I, whereas the con stant of non saturable diffusion (Kd) equaled 0.957 ± 0.067 x 10-4 S -I in the parietal lobe during saline per fusion. V rna' was higher in the cortical lobes than in other brain areas, probably owing to a greater capillary surface area. There were no regional differences in Kill or Kd. The apparent Kill for L-Ieucine during plasma perfusion wasThe cerebrovascular endothelium. in addition to restricting the exchange of ions. proteins, and hy drophilic nonelectrolytes, has specific transport systems for rapid transfer of essential nutrients from plasma to brain (Rapoport, 1976 port (Takasato et aI., [984). First, the perfusion technique is 100 times more sensitive than the BU[ technique for the measurement of cerebrovascular permeability. Second, the rat� 01' regional cerebral perfusion is measured directly during perfusion, whereas the cerebral flow rate of the B UI intraca rotid bolus has never been determined experimen tally. Third, with the perfusion technique, there is negligible mixing of perfusate with blood before the perfusion fluid reaches the brain capillaries (Taka sato et aI., [984). In contrast, the assumption that the B U [ intracarotid bolus does not mix with blood before reaching the capillaries has never been ver ified experimentally (Fenstermacher et aI., 198 I).Minimal mixing is important, owing to the sensi tivity of cerebrovascular amino acid transport to competition effects (Rapoport, [976; Pard ridge . 1977a). Fourth, the perfusion technique, unlike the intravenous injection method, allows virtually ab solute control of solute concentrations in brain cap illaries. And last, the perfusion method, unlike the intravenous injection method, is not subject to er-