2012
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2011.11.6810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Trends in the Management of Difficult Urinary Catherizations

Abstract: Routine urinary catheter placement may cause trauma and poses a risk of infection. Male catheterization, in particular, can be difficult, especially in patients with enlarged prostate glands or other potentially obstructive conditions in the lower urinary tract. Solutions to problematic urinary catheterization are not well known and when difficult catheterization occurs, the risk of failed catheterization and concomitant complications increase. Repeated and unsuccessful attempts at urinary catheterization indu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, education and awareness regarding this could possibly avoid future incidents.A large number of the iatrogenic UC injuries occurred in the emergency department. Wilette et al 12 constructed a difficult catheterization algorithm for emergency medicine doctors to recognize possible difficulties, such as high bladder neck, enlarged prostate, and urethral stricture, to enable timely urological input. There is also an overall lack of knowledge of special catheters that can be used in this setting, such as coude-tipped catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, education and awareness regarding this could possibly avoid future incidents.A large number of the iatrogenic UC injuries occurred in the emergency department. Wilette et al 12 constructed a difficult catheterization algorithm for emergency medicine doctors to recognize possible difficulties, such as high bladder neck, enlarged prostate, and urethral stricture, to enable timely urological input. There is also an overall lack of knowledge of special catheters that can be used in this setting, such as coude-tipped catheters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation induces pain for the patient and uses to lesion the urethra creating false passages which may do impossible blind urethral catheterization and will obligate to place a suprapubic catheter or to perform an optically helped passage with a rigid or flexible cystoscope. Moreover, posterior healing of this lesions may create a urethral stricture or other definitive problems requiring surgical reconstruction (3,6,8). If unsuccessful, repeated attempts with the same catheter are usually done, Catheterization with a different size or consistency probe (typically larger or harder) may be attempted or another more experienced healthcare worker may help in the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only nurses or emergency physicians properly trained, and with a clear strategy to face the situation, may repeat blind catheterization. If nobody fulfills this characteristic, a urologist has to be requested to decide about any new attempt of blind catheterization or to perform endoscopic maneuvers (3,4,6,7). Little is taught about difficult catheterization during nurse training which is more focused to prevent urinary infection by cleaning properly external genitalia or to create a close urinary circuit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, many complications with indwelling catheters in the bladder have been reported, such as infection, periurethral abscess, bladder stones, and injury to the urethra, hemorrhage, and epididymo-orchitis [1][2][3]. Male catheterization can be difficult, especially in patients with enlarged prostate glands or other potentially obstructive conditions in the lower urinary tract [3]. Perforation of the urinary bladder due to an indwelling urinary catheter is a rare but life-threatening complication, and usually requires an emergent operation [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%