2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06378-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Trends in the Utilization of a Robotic Approach in the Field of Bariatric Surgery

Abstract: Purpose The utilization rate of robotic surgery for bariatric procedures is not well-described. Our study identified the proportion of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedures in the United States between 2015 and 2020 performed using a robotic (R-) or laparoscopic (L-) approach. Materials and Methods A descriptive analysis of the 2015–2020 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant User Data File (PUF) da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The robotic approach to bariatric surgery has been growing at a fast pace in recent years with tripling of the amount of robotic SG and RYGB from 2015 to 2020. 66 Despite a longer operative time, studies have shown no significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for bariatric surgery. 67 Even though a robotic approach does not necessarily improve outcomes, there are benefits that are harder to quantify such as improved visualization, improved instrument degrees of freedom, surgeon comfort, and ability to perform the procedure without a skilled surgical assistant.…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robotic approach to bariatric surgery has been growing at a fast pace in recent years with tripling of the amount of robotic SG and RYGB from 2015 to 2020. 66 Despite a longer operative time, studies have shown no significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for bariatric surgery. 67 Even though a robotic approach does not necessarily improve outcomes, there are benefits that are harder to quantify such as improved visualization, improved instrument degrees of freedom, surgeon comfort, and ability to perform the procedure without a skilled surgical assistant.…”
Section: Future Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the nuances of selecting the surgical approach are outside the scope of this study, it is worth noting that laparoscopic procedures (with or without the surgical robot) are standard-of-care, and significant differences in postoperative morbidity among the three approaches have not been reliably demonstrated [40]. There is a trend towards increased utilization of the surgical robot, given the theoretical advantages of decreased tissue injury, improved wound healing, and augmented suturing dexterity [41]. The distribution of approaches in the present cohort is as follows: open, 5.0%; laparoscopic, 74.9%; robotic, 20.1%.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the working space and exposure is limited, while torque forces are amplified ( 4 , 5 ). In addition, the further preference for hand-sewn anastomosis construction, has steered several bariatric surgeons towards the more ergonomic robotic solutions ( 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first robotic-assisted bariatric procedure was performed in 1998 by Cadiere for gastric banding ( 8 ), soon followed by a robotic-assisted RYGB (RRYGB) ( 9 ). Since then, proportions of RRYGB operations performed, utilizing the Da Vinci platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), have steadily increased, reaching a percentage of 16.7 by 2020 in the U.S. ( 7 ). RRYGB has been associated with lower rates of complications but longer operative times and higher costs when compared to laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) in meta-analyses ( 3 , 10 , 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%