2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01143.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
98
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In presence of active CMV infection, the immunosuppression should be reduced along with instituting specific therapy such as Ganciclovir/Valganciclovir. 74,75 Rejection Acute cellular rejection (ACR) presents with a histological triad of portal tract infiltrates, bile duct injury, and venous endothelialitis, 76 typically biopsy proven acute rejection is treated with pulse intravenous steroid boluses. In many cases, mild to moderated rejection can be treated with increasing the levels of CNI alone.…”
Section: Immunosuppression and CMV Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presence of active CMV infection, the immunosuppression should be reduced along with instituting specific therapy such as Ganciclovir/Valganciclovir. 74,75 Rejection Acute cellular rejection (ACR) presents with a histological triad of portal tract infiltrates, bile duct injury, and venous endothelialitis, 76 typically biopsy proven acute rejection is treated with pulse intravenous steroid boluses. In many cases, mild to moderated rejection can be treated with increasing the levels of CNI alone.…”
Section: Immunosuppression and CMV Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of IPTH is difficult to determine and varies considerably among transplant centres. The first reason is the lack of proper definition [4] . Indeed, IPTH is most common in centres that perform protocol LBs and in those that traditionally run patients on low levels of immunosuppression [4,8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first reason is the lack of proper definition [4] . Indeed, IPTH is most common in centres that perform protocol LBs and in those that traditionally run patients on low levels of immunosuppression [4,8] . Overall, prevalence increases over time from 10% to 50% of protocol LB performed > 1 year posttransplant in adults, and in up to 60% of children at 10 years post-LT [2] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…84,95,97 Therefore, C4d staining should be interpreted with caution and has no particular significance without the correct clinical context and congruent histopathologic changes in the biopsy. 83,87,93,98 With positive staining, the possibility of ABMR can be raised but not specifically diagnosed.…”
Section: Livermentioning
confidence: 99%