1995
DOI: 10.1080/0950069950170405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum and assessment in science education: the policy interface

Abstract: The paper describes how a new national curriculum and assessment system for England and Wales was set up in 1988 and the frequent changes which it has endured since then. Curriculum specification attempted to broaden the aims of science teaching and to specify sequences for learning. Assessment policy struggled with attempts to enhance formative assessment and with tensions between external tests and teachers' internal assessments. The story illustrates problems about progression in learning, about criterion r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper aims to contribute to the clarification and expansion of how NOS can be conceptualized in science classrooms for meaningful teaching and assessment, particularly through the design of curriculum and high-stakes assessments. Researchers commonly posit that apart from curriculum documents, the design of teaching and assessments in classroom can be affected by high-stakes assessments (Black, 1995;Brookhart, 2010;Erduran, Cullinane, & Wooding, 2019). More importantly, this paper also explores how the government documents and high-stakes assessments align with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper aims to contribute to the clarification and expansion of how NOS can be conceptualized in science classrooms for meaningful teaching and assessment, particularly through the design of curriculum and high-stakes assessments. Researchers commonly posit that apart from curriculum documents, the design of teaching and assessments in classroom can be affected by high-stakes assessments (Black, 1995;Brookhart, 2010;Erduran, Cullinane, & Wooding, 2019). More importantly, this paper also explores how the government documents and high-stakes assessments align with each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%