2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum-Based Measurement Oral Reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
169
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
169
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As school psychologists work within an RtI model to address the reading skill deficits of these at-risk students, the implementation of reading fluency interventions is essential. Given our understanding of the relationship between reading fluency and comprehension, we would expect that, as reading fluency increases, so too would reading comprehension (Reschly et al, 2009). Data from this study add support to the assertion that reading fluency is necessary yet not sufficient for comprehension.…”
Section: Implications For Practicesupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As school psychologists work within an RtI model to address the reading skill deficits of these at-risk students, the implementation of reading fluency interventions is essential. Given our understanding of the relationship between reading fluency and comprehension, we would expect that, as reading fluency increases, so too would reading comprehension (Reschly et al, 2009). Data from this study add support to the assertion that reading fluency is necessary yet not sufficient for comprehension.…”
Section: Implications For Practicesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…One of the reasons for the skepticism is premised on the assertion that fluency also reflects comprehension, the goal of reading. This relationship between fluency and comprehension has been established by researchers correlating R-CBM measures of reading fluency with established, norm-referenced measures of reading comprehension (e.g., Bain & Garlock, 1992;Deno, Mirkin, & Chiang, 1982;Fuchs & Deno, 1992;Fuchs, Fuchs, & Maxell, 1988;Jenkins & Jewell, 1993;Martson, 1989;Reschly, Busch, Betts, Deno, & Long, 2009;Shinn, Good, Knutson, Tilly, & Collins, 1992). Reported correlations between R-CBM and comprehension are moderate to strong, ranging from .54 to .93, and have been found to be stronger than those correlations between more typical measures of comprehension (e.g., question answering) and norm-referenced measures of comprehension.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Review studies suggest that decoding skills develop faster than comprehension skills, and consequently, FL learners have significantly larger gaps between scores on RF and reading comprehension measures compared with L1 learners (Quirk & Beam, 2012;Reschly et al, 2009). The reason why FL learners lag behind their comprehension skills can be explained by the lack of vocabulary skills (Lervå g & Aukrust, 2009) or syntactic knowledge (Shiotsu & Weir, 2007).…”
Section: Reading Fluency In a Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, the target scores on GOMs are being established based on their prediction of state-mandated assessments (Reschly et al 2009). What is not known is the degree to which this presents variability across states, or how this will be impacted as states move toward new collaborative state assessments such as those being developed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC).…”
Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%