The widening participation agenda has important implications for those in English-medium higher education institutions responsible for the provision of English language support. Importantly, given the diverse nature of the 'non-traditional' student cohort that is the focus of this agenda, that section of the student population potentially requiring English language development extends beyond those students of non-English speaking backgrounds -traditionally the focus of such provision -to include native speakers of English whose language exhibits forms -dialectal characteristics -not necessarily in keeping with the expectations of the academy or indeed the workplace, post-graduation. In order to ensure that these students have access to language support resources that are squeezed by ever-present funding pressures, there needs to be a mechanism for identifying those most at risk due to weak language. This article considers some of the issues around the implementation of a post-enrolment English language assessment regime.Keywords: Widening participation, English language proficiency, post-enrolment language assessment, language competence of non-traditional students
Introduction
2In common with other countries where English-medium universities are the norm, Australia has, in recent years, witnessed an interesting and important convergence of two facets of higher education, each of which has assumed a place of some prominence on political and education agendas. The first concerns widening participation and associated policies and strategies designed to raise the aspirations and opportunities of individuals from socioeconomic, educational and cultural milieu traditionally under-represented in higher education (Krause, Hartley, James & McInnis, 2005; Pascarella & Terrenzini, 1998;Pitman & Broomhall, 2009) with a view to promoting greater equity through a more diverse student population defined on the basis of academic potential rather than personal situational circumstance. In large part, such initiatives reflect not only ethical concerns around equal opportunity but also what Osborne describes as 'worldwide concerns expressed by both international bodies and national governments that there are strong economic reasons for increasing access and for widening the constituency that higher education serves by including those groups who have traditionally been excluded ' (2003:6). In Australia, these 'concerns' have most recently found voice in the Bradley Review of Higher Education (Bradley 2008: xi), the Executive Summary of which states:To increase the numbers participating [in university degree programs] we must also look to members of groups currently under-represented within the system, that is, those disadvantaged by the circumstances of their birth: Indigenous people, people with low socio-economic status, and those from regional and remote areas.The report goes on to say that, by 2020, students from low socio-economic backgrounds should account for twenty per cent of undergraduate enrolments in Australian higher ...