2009
DOI: 10.1080/09585170902763981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum‐making in school and college: the case of hospitality

Abstract: 2 Curriculum-making in school and college: The case of hospitality Abstract Drawing upon research in the curriculum of Hospitality, this article explores the contrasting ways in which the prescribed curriculum is translated into the enacted curriculum is school and college contexts. It identifies organisational culture and teacher and student backgrounds and dispositions as central to the emerging contrasts.It uses this evidence to argue that the evolution of credit frameworks which assume a rational curriculu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we explored the differences between the 'prescribed' curriculum (as it is devised and published by the relevant national Ministries of Education) and the 'enacted' or 'interpreted' curriculum. The latter refers to how, in practice, the curriculum is adapted and interpreted by the individual teacher and then delivered within the classroom (Bloomer, 1997;Edwards, Miller, & Priestley, 2009). Our interest here was the scope that teachers have to vary the curriculum at local level (Llewellyn, Cook, & Molina, 2010).…”
Section: Interviews With Teachers Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we explored the differences between the 'prescribed' curriculum (as it is devised and published by the relevant national Ministries of Education) and the 'enacted' or 'interpreted' curriculum. The latter refers to how, in practice, the curriculum is adapted and interpreted by the individual teacher and then delivered within the classroom (Bloomer, 1997;Edwards, Miller, & Priestley, 2009). Our interest here was the scope that teachers have to vary the curriculum at local level (Llewellyn, Cook, & Molina, 2010).…”
Section: Interviews With Teachers Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical framework adopted within this study explores these tensions within the literature on how best to teach vocational subjects, while also building upon our previous research on teaching generic skills (Canning 2007(Canning , 2011 and curriculum-making in schools and colleges (Bloomer 1997;Edwards et al 2009). The concept of 'useful knowledge' will be used to reflect the pragmatic nature in much of what is taught within the vocational curriculum.…”
Section: Theoretical Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that teachers can play an important role in this process by successfully 'enacting' a prescribed curriculum in order to encourage active and sustained learning (Bloomer 1997;Edwards et al 2009). We also know that teachers frequently offer their own direct experience of the workplace in order to provide a context of learning for their pupils (Berner 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the turn of the twenty-first century the term curriculum making re-emerged, for instance in the context of post-compulsory education curriculum construction in the late 1990s (Bloomer, 1997) and in reflections on policy, professionalism and design issues affecting the primary curriculum and its future (Hulme & Livingston, 2012). Recently Edwards, Miller, and Priestley (2009a) have considered curriculum making at the classroom level of a unit of study. This and another study (Clayton, 2007) serve as preludes to introducing the use and meaning of curriculum making by the GA as a context for its recent projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus was 'cultures of curriculum making' (Edwards et al, 2009a(Edwards et al, , 2009b, particularly in relation to teacher and student perspectives and the enactment of the curriculum in classroom settings. In reviewing the related literature, five factors affecting curriculum making were identified: contextual factors, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%