2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum Support for Teachers’ Negotiation of Meaning: A Collective Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the preparation stage of teaching, it was found that textbooks played a highly facilitating role in teachers’ understanding of mathematical content, including mathematics concepts, formulae, and theorems. The result is consistent with the findings of some previous studies (e.g., Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018 ) that textbooks helped teachers understand central ideas of mathematics for their teaching. With regard to evaluation, according to the results from the interview data and previous literature (e.g., Ulusoy & Incikabi, 2020 ), we think that textbook developers need to design assessment tasks in such a way that they can better meet the needs and levels of different students so as to better facilitate teachers’ teaching.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in the preparation stage of teaching, it was found that textbooks played a highly facilitating role in teachers’ understanding of mathematical content, including mathematics concepts, formulae, and theorems. The result is consistent with the findings of some previous studies (e.g., Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018 ) that textbooks helped teachers understand central ideas of mathematics for their teaching. With regard to evaluation, according to the results from the interview data and previous literature (e.g., Ulusoy & Incikabi, 2020 ), we think that textbook developers need to design assessment tasks in such a way that they can better meet the needs and levels of different students so as to better facilitate teachers’ teaching.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, in the preparation stage of teaching, it was found that textbooks played a highly facilitating role in teachers' understanding of mathematical content, including mathematics concepts, formulae, and theorems. The result is consistent with the findings of some previous studies (e.g., Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018) that textbooks helped teachers understand central ideas of mathematics for their teaching.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In a previous study (Kaufmann & Ryve, 2019) we analyzed teachers' collegial discussions with the aim of theorizing about how the teachers' role was constructed collegially. These collegial discussions were part of a large professional development program for mathematics teachers (Boost for Mathematics, BfM, Insulander et al, 2019, Steenbrugge et al, 2018, and the analysis of the collegial discussions resulted in the identification of three main discourses within which teachers tended to navigate and position themselves. Three discourses emerged from the analysis of collegial discussion data: a traditional discourse, a reformoriented discourse (see, e.g., Kilpatrick et al, 2001;Munter et al, 2015;Valoyes-Chávez, 2019), and a democratic teacher role discourse.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…National evaluations (Österholm et al, 2016;Ramböll, 2016) and research studies (e.g., Boesen et al, 2015;Insulander et al, 2019;Lindvall et al, 2018;Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018) of BfM have been conducted, focusing on different aspects of its implementation or impacts on teachers, instruction, and students. Only two of these, however, have emphasized issues that are in focus in the present study: the impact of BfM on mathematics instruction (Österholm et al, 2016) and on student achievement (Lindvall et al, 2018).…”
Section: Previous Evaluations and Studies Of Boost For Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can function as a tool to allow teachers to focus on specific aspects of their practice instead of everything at once (Kazemi & Hubbard, 2008). In fact, two recent studies investigating how different PD materials from BfM supported teachers' negotiation of meaning around these resources (Insulander et al, 2019;Van Steenbrugge et al, 2018) indicate that more prescriptive materials (e.g., suggesting certain teacher actions) supported teachers' participation around central didactical ideas in the collegial discussions to a higher extent than did materials that rely on teachers drawing on their previous knowledge and making independent judgements. This supports Grossman and McDonald's (2008) call for increased levels of pedagogies of enactment.…”
Section: The Professional Development Program's Designmentioning
confidence: 99%