2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4145-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curriculum vitae of the LOTOS–EUROS (v2.0) chemistry transport model

Abstract: Abstract. The development and application of chemistry transport models has a long tradition. Within the Netherlands the LOTOS-EUROS model has been developed by a consortium of institutes, after combining its independently developed predecessors in 2005. Recently, version 2.0 of the model was released as an open-source version. This paper presents the curriculum vitae of the model system, describing the model's history, model philosophy, basic features and a validation with EMEP stations for the new benchmark … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
127
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
1
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six CTMs were used to estimate wet deposition in Europe for the period 1990-2010: Chimere , CMAQ (Byun and Schere, 2006), EMEP MSC-W , LOTOS-EUROS (Manders et al, 2017), MATCH (Robertson et al, 1999) and MINNI (Mircea et al, 2014. The shortened model names CHIM, CMAQ, EMEP, LOTO, MATCH and MINNI are used throughout the article.…”
Section: Model Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Six CTMs were used to estimate wet deposition in Europe for the period 1990-2010: Chimere , CMAQ (Byun and Schere, 2006), EMEP MSC-W , LOTOS-EUROS (Manders et al, 2017), MATCH (Robertson et al, 1999) and MINNI (Mircea et al, 2014. The shortened model names CHIM, CMAQ, EMEP, LOTO, MATCH and MINNI are used throughout the article.…”
Section: Model Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical significance of the trends in observed and modelled wet deposition and precipitation, as well as in the emissions, was calculated using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test, which assesses whether there is a statistically significant monotonic trend in a data time series (Mann, 1945;Kendall, 1970). This is a non-parametric test and so is suited to data sets that are not necessarily normally distributed (unlike other methods, such as linear regression).…”
Section: Appendix A: Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite-based observations of tropospheric NO 2 columns by solar backscatter have been used extensively as a proxy for NO x emissions and their trends (Martin, 2008;. These observations have been qualitatively consistent with the trends in Chinese NO x emission inventories, showing an increasing trend of NO 2 columns over China between 1994 and 2011, with a sharp reversal in eastern China V. Shah et al: Effect of changing NO x lifetime since 2011 (Richter et al, 2005;van der A et al, 2006, 2008Krotkov et al, 2016;Schneider et al, 2015;Duncan et al, 2016;Cui et al, 2016;Georgoulias et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2019). However, the trends in the NO 2 columns are steeper than in the emission inventories (Zhang et al, 2007; Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF and MLR models explaining more than 20 % of the statistical variance of measurements could be calculated for Cd, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, Zn and N. The following predictors had the highest relative significance for estimating element concentrations in the mosses: The predictor with the strongest variable significance was the sampled moss species (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn and N). The atmospheric deposition calculated with the chemical transport models LOTOS-EUROS (LE; [22,35,36], EMEP/MSC-E [49] and EMEP/MSC-W [43] (year 2015, mean of the years 2013-2015), the MMD 2015 shows a lower predictive force for the respective element concentrations in the mosses than in previous campaigns. For N (LE; 2013-2015) and Hg (EMEP; 2013-2015) the calculated deposition in moss monitoring has a mean variable significance, for Cd (EMEP; 2013-2015) a minor significance and for Pb no significance as a predictor in the statistical models.…”
Section: Results MMD 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%