2000
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200012000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curvature and Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine After Laminaplasty*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 The increase in spinal canal space provided by this procedure is 85% in sagittal diameter 8 and 36% in cross-sectional area, 7 suggesting the potential for an increase in spinal canal volume, causing some kinetic alteration of the spinal cord. Although kinetic changes of the cervical spine after laminoplasty were described previously, 13 to our knowledge, there are no previous ki- The data in the present study indicate that the cord of the patients after laminoplasty moved dorsally toward the expanded posterior elements of the spinal canal and retain its dorsal position in the dilated spinal canal at any of the flexed, neutral, or extended spinal positions. Baba et al 14 reported that the spinal cord shifts posteriorly because of the increase of cervical spine lordosis following laminoplasty, and postulated a strong relation between postoperative neurologic improvement and posterior cord migration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…7,8 The increase in spinal canal space provided by this procedure is 85% in sagittal diameter 8 and 36% in cross-sectional area, 7 suggesting the potential for an increase in spinal canal volume, causing some kinetic alteration of the spinal cord. Although kinetic changes of the cervical spine after laminoplasty were described previously, 13 to our knowledge, there are no previous ki- The data in the present study indicate that the cord of the patients after laminoplasty moved dorsally toward the expanded posterior elements of the spinal canal and retain its dorsal position in the dilated spinal canal at any of the flexed, neutral, or extended spinal positions. Baba et al 14 reported that the spinal cord shifts posteriorly because of the increase of cervical spine lordosis following laminoplasty, and postulated a strong relation between postoperative neurologic improvement and posterior cord migration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…After conventional (no sparing of muscle insertions) C3-7 laminoplasty, loss of C2-7 angle has been reported to reach 6.2 to 11.7 degrees. [15][16][17] Kyphotic deformity often develops after laminectomy from C1 or C2 to the subaxial cervical spine. 18 Biomechanical analysis showed that the semispinalis cervicis and C2 lamina play an important role in dynamically stabilizing the cervical spine and that a loss of cervical lordosis results from detachment of the semispinalis attached to the C2 spinous process, 19 suggesting that a loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty mainly results from detachment of muscles attached to the C2 spinous process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C2-7 angle can reach 6.2°-11.7° after conventional surgery. 1,23,37 In addition, cervical ROM is reportedly reduced to 30%-70% of the preoperative value following laminoplasty. 2,6,27 Several authors have recommended that the insertion of the semispinalis into C-2 should be preserved during laminoplasty.…”
Section: Sagittal Alignment and Rommentioning
confidence: 99%