1983
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/34.1.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Curvature Correction Factors in the Measurement of Cell Surface Areas in Plant Tissues1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
113
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor 1.34 accounts for cell surfaces that were not uniformly perpendicular to the plane of the section based on the average width to height ratio for palisade and spongy cells [7,19]. The fraction of mesophyll tissue occupied by the intercellular air spaces (f ias ) was determined as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor 1.34 accounts for cell surfaces that were not uniformly perpendicular to the plane of the section based on the average width to height ratio for palisade and spongy cells [7,19]. The fraction of mesophyll tissue occupied by the intercellular air spaces (f ias ) was determined as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first applications of stereology in plant anatomy were published by Pazourek (1975;, Chabot and Chabot (1977), Parkhurst (1982), Morris andThain (1983), andHajibagheri et al (1984). Later, a number of design-based stereological methods for the estimation of various leaf characteristics were introduced by Kubínová (1987;1989b;1991;1993;.…”
Section: Short History Of Quantification Of Plant Anatomical Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding areas were measured by a point-counting method, based on counting points of the test grid falling in the tissue under study (Chabot and Chabot, 1977;Pazourek, 1977;Pazourek and Nátr, 1981;Parkhurst, 1982;Hajibagheri et al, 1984;Gowland et al, 1987;Pazourek et al, 1987;Kubínová, 1991;Albrechtová, 1994), by a planimeter (Turrell, 1936), by cutting out the enlarged drawings of the sections and weighing them (El-Sharkawy and Hesketh, 1965;Charles-Edwards et al, 1972;Dengler and MacKay, 1975), by a semiautomatic image analyser (Parker and Ford, 1982) or by a stereological method based on length measurements (linear integration method, Weibel, 1979;Thain, 1983). A number of studies (e.g., Gundersen and Jensen, 1987) showed that, in general, the point-counting method using a regular grid of points (which is positioned uniformly at random on the section) is the most effective one.…”
Section: Plant Tissue Volume Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations