2021
DOI: 10.1108/ijbm-04-2021-0134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer helping and advocacy behaviours within dyadic financial service relationships: a gift-giving perspective

Abstract: PurposeThis study aims to examine customer helping and advocacy behaviours within dyadic financial service relationships involving customers and fellow customer helpers.Design/methodology/approachThe gift-giving literature was used to propose a customer-to-customer interaction model, which was tested and cross-validated among electronic banking customers in South Africa (n = 404) and Australia (n = 244). Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to respondents who are users of electronic banking servic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these varied foundations, prior literature accordingly suggests different approaches to managing CCI (i.e. facilitate positive CCI; prevent and recover negative CCI), including customer compatibility management (Ekpo et al , 2015; Martin and Pranter, 1989), customer education (van Tonder et al , 2022), employee training (Nicholls and Gad Mohsen, 2019), service design (Nicholls and Gad Mohsen, 2015), modification of the physical servicescape (Furrer et al , 2023) and negative CCI recovery actions (Kim and Baker, 2020). However, similar to the lack of unity and robustness of the theoretical foundations of CCI research, the suggested modes of CCI management are often ad hoc and industry-specific (Nicholls, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these varied foundations, prior literature accordingly suggests different approaches to managing CCI (i.e. facilitate positive CCI; prevent and recover negative CCI), including customer compatibility management (Ekpo et al , 2015; Martin and Pranter, 1989), customer education (van Tonder et al , 2022), employee training (Nicholls and Gad Mohsen, 2019), service design (Nicholls and Gad Mohsen, 2015), modification of the physical servicescape (Furrer et al , 2023) and negative CCI recovery actions (Kim and Baker, 2020). However, similar to the lack of unity and robustness of the theoretical foundations of CCI research, the suggested modes of CCI management are often ad hoc and industry-specific (Nicholls, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%