2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12008-015-0273-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Customer sentiment appraisal from user-generated product reviews: a domain independent heuristic algorithm

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the relationships among customer perceived value, service quality and customer satisfaction, this study uses online customer ratings. Spontaneous online reviews and ratings of tourism and hospitality products and services posted by customers on OTAs are considered a reliable source of information (Raghupathi et al, 2015), able to provide noncommercial, detailed, rich, experiential, fast, freely accessible and up-to-date information (Gao et al, 2018a;Pahlevan Sharif and Mura, 2019;Yoo and Gretzel, 2011). While primary data obtained using traditional methods, such as interviews, questionnaires and surveys suffer from the impact of the test situation (McGue and Bouchard, 1998), OTAs provide a platform for customers to express themselves without fear, pressure, intimidation or incentives (Lewis and Van Horn, 2013), and as such, represent an authentic and trustworthy source of information about products and services (Gao et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the relationships among customer perceived value, service quality and customer satisfaction, this study uses online customer ratings. Spontaneous online reviews and ratings of tourism and hospitality products and services posted by customers on OTAs are considered a reliable source of information (Raghupathi et al, 2015), able to provide noncommercial, detailed, rich, experiential, fast, freely accessible and up-to-date information (Gao et al, 2018a;Pahlevan Sharif and Mura, 2019;Yoo and Gretzel, 2011). While primary data obtained using traditional methods, such as interviews, questionnaires and surveys suffer from the impact of the test situation (McGue and Bouchard, 1998), OTAs provide a platform for customers to express themselves without fear, pressure, intimidation or incentives (Lewis and Van Horn, 2013), and as such, represent an authentic and trustworthy source of information about products and services (Gao et al, 2018b).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique has played role in opinion extraction and summarization (Hu & Liu, 2006). This text summarization engulfs text parsing (Archak, Ghose, & Ipeirotis, 2007Hu & Liu, 2006) with POS tagging used in the above-cited group, along with Aravindan & Ekbal (2014); Bafna & Toshniwal (2013); Ingale & Phursule (2014) ; Raghupathi, Yannou, Farel, & Poirson (2015). Classification algorithms also find a vivid place in the literature, to meet desired outcomes.…”
Section: Textual Analysis Of Online Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Bai (2011) proposes a heuristic search-enhanced Markov blanket model to accomplish sentiment classification, by using word dependency logic. Raghupathi et al (2015) did sentiment classification based on heuristics. The authors developed an algorithm using text parsing, followed by usage of a Dictionary of Affect Language to rate word tree leaves and finally a series of basic heuristics to calculate backward an overall sentiment rating for the review.…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis did not further discern which specific aspects of each product feature were being discussed. Phraselevel identification focused on extracting expressions or phrases from review sentences that contained the customer's opinion [14], [18], [21], [24]. This phrase-level identification allowed for the most intuitive verification of customer opinions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%