2012
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.95178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cut margins and disease control in oral cancers

Abstract: Margins are an important predictor of disease control. The surgeon must aim for adequate margins at initial resection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates a poor prognosis. According to an institutional study from India, the average disease free survival time is around 35 months (Priya et al, 2012). Retrospective analytical studies from hospitals present patterns of recurrence and the factors influencing it.…”
Section: Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates a poor prognosis. According to an institutional study from India, the average disease free survival time is around 35 months (Priya et al, 2012). Retrospective analytical studies from hospitals present patterns of recurrence and the factors influencing it.…”
Section: Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral tongue is a muscular organ, Hence a three dimensional concept of margins beyond the tumor is easily applicable. Usually, a measured intraoperative resection margin of 1 to 2 cm is recommended to achieve a microscopically clear margin of 5 mm [5,[8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Oral Tonguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, a measured distance between the tumor edge and the cut margins of the specimen gives the adequacy of surgical resection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [4]. A margin more than 5 (mm) is considered clear, less than 5 mm is close and less than one mm is denoted as involved [5]. But, this principle may not be universally applicable in all head and neck sites and their sub-sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…malignant disease left behind after ablative oncologic surgery leads to recurrent disease and adversely affects outcomes [8,9] . The literature is clear that in order to maximize survival, reduce recurrence, and improve quality of life for patients undergoing oncologic head and neck surgery, negative margins are paramount [10][11][12][13][14] .…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%