1956
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970270006002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutaneous Sensitivity Reactions to Chlorpromazine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1958
1958
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baer and Harber feel that following ingestion of a drug (internal sensitization) the eczcmatogens responsible for a photoallergic reaction may be formed by an unknown internal mechanism elsewhere in the body other than in the skin (1). Mullins suggests that the use of patch tests is therefore of little value in deter mining whether or not a patient might react to chlorpromazine ad ministered systematically (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baer and Harber feel that following ingestion of a drug (internal sensitization) the eczcmatogens responsible for a photoallergic reaction may be formed by an unknown internal mechanism elsewhere in the body other than in the skin (1). Mullins suggests that the use of patch tests is therefore of little value in deter mining whether or not a patient might react to chlorpromazine ad ministered systematically (15).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Cohen's (37) series the incidence was 8 per cent. While the most common reaction is a localized or generalized maculopapular eruption, almost all types of cutaneous eruptions can occur, according to Mullins and Farrington (126), with the exception of mucous membrane involvement. In their series (126) the eruption occurred in patients getting 400 mg. or more daily.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the most common reaction is a localized or generalized maculopapular eruption, almost all types of cutaneous eruptions can occur, according to Mullins and Farrington (126), with the exception of mucous membrane involvement. In their series (126) the eruption occurred in patients getting 400 mg. or more daily. Cohen (37) feels that these manifestations are on an allergic basis and are unrelated to level of dosage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%