2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

Abstract: Cutting balloon angioplasty did not reduce recurrent ISR and major adverse cardiac events, as compared with conventional PTCA. However, CBA was associated with some procedural advantages, such as use of fewer balloons, less requirement for additional stenting, and a lower incidence of balloon slippage.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CB has been shown to facilitate dilation of fibrotic and restenotic lesions with less dissection and less bailout stenting. 13,14 Also, cryoplasty reduces elastic recoil of the arterial segment by altering elastin fibers in the vessel wall. 15 This potentially reduces recoil and need for stenting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CB has been shown to facilitate dilation of fibrotic and restenotic lesions with less dissection and less bailout stenting. 13,14 Also, cryoplasty reduces elastic recoil of the arterial segment by altering elastin fibers in the vessel wall. 15 This potentially reduces recoil and need for stenting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of note that the CB has been reported to be safer for the reason that it does not slip out the stent and because the incisions made the dilatation of the elastic neointimal mass easier. Altogether, the use of CB in in-stent restenosis is associated with some procedural advantages [9]. Furthermore, CB still has its role besides other alternatives in treating fibrocalcific lesions, some bifurcational lesions, and ostial stenoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a careful matching process, late lumen loss, loss index and restenosis rates were significantly lower after CBA. These favorable results, however, could not be confirmed in the RESCUT trial, 8 in which 428 patients with BMS-ISR were randomized to PBA or CBA. After CBA, the occurrence of balloon slippage was significantly reduced (6.5% vs 25%) and there was a trend for a lower requirement of stenting.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A similar problem might have afflicted RESCUT. 8 Fifth, subgroups analyses, specially limited by sample size constraints, are of interest as hypothesis generating. Indeed, the possibility that CBA may be particularly advantageous in patients with DES-ISR and in focal lesions would require confirmation in larger studies.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%