1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0099-2399(85)80082-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part 1: A quantitative comparison of the tip and fluted regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instrument tip design has been described as cutting, noncutting, or partially cutting. Studies have shown that tip design helps the file to stay centered within the canal and affects the shaping of the root canal system (12,13). Flutes are grooves on the working surface to collect and remove debris from dentinal walls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instrument tip design has been described as cutting, noncutting, or partially cutting. Studies have shown that tip design helps the file to stay centered within the canal and affects the shaping of the root canal system (12,13). Flutes are grooves on the working surface to collect and remove debris from dentinal walls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven that excessive preparation at the curvature and at the apex causes transportation and enlargement of the canal orifice (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Whether these changes have influences on stress distribution in pulpless teeth or whether the thin dentine at the curve site or root apex are likely to be the initial part of the VRF is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1980) introduced the use of the bovine bone test specimen. Miserendino et al . (1985) continued to use this model for studying cutting efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%