2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06619-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting factors and testing of highly viscoelastic fluid abrasive flow machining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason is that the mold is repeatedly heated [28] and cooled during the wax injection process. Ongoing research is focused on improving the surface roughness of the CCC by abrasive blasting, abrasive flow machining [29], electrochemical polishing, chemical polishing, laser polishing, or ultrasonic cavitation abrasive finishing. In various industries, hydrogen [30,31] is widely applied as a high-performance gaseous cooling medium since its thermal conductivity is higher than all other gases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that the mold is repeatedly heated [28] and cooled during the wax injection process. Ongoing research is focused on improving the surface roughness of the CCC by abrasive blasting, abrasive flow machining [29], electrochemical polishing, chemical polishing, laser polishing, or ultrasonic cavitation abrasive finishing. In various industries, hydrogen [30,31] is widely applied as a high-performance gaseous cooling medium since its thermal conductivity is higher than all other gases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Furthermore, the medium pressure acts on the hemispherical surface of active abrasive particle in the normal direction of workpiece surface, providing normal force for the particles to penetrate into surface material. [14][15][16] It is obvious that tangential force on the active abrasive particle is absent in this model, and scratch depth is dependent on the medium pressure and particle size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical abrasive particle size lies in the range of 32-1035 µm, as mentioned by Trengove [14], while concentration of the abrasive may approach 80%, after which the medium begins to act inefficiently, as demonstrated by Kar et al [15]. An interesting method to assess the cutting forces of abrasive flow machining using a two-phase viscoelastic flow approach was proposed by Dong et al [16] This method combines an analytical model for calculating the cutting factors and an experimental technique to calibrate this model. While this approach provides an interesting insight into the abrading behavior of AFM media and offers a new perspective for the optimization of the media composition, it cannot directly be applied to predict the material removal (MR) during the AFM process and, therefore, to determine the machining allowances of the parts to be polished.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%