Cutting parameters influence investigations on cutting consumed power, surface roughness and tool wear during turning of superalloy VAT 32 with PVD coated carbide tools using Taguchi method

Kondo, Marcel Yuzo; Pinheiro, Cleverson; Paula, Marcelo Antunes de; Souza, Taise A de; Souza, José Vitor C.; Ribeiro, Marcos Valério; Alves, Manoel

doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab0da8

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is observed that both PVDMNC and PECVD cutting tools perform well at lower cutting speeds and feed rates. Similar results have been reported in one of the studies conducted by Kondo et al [18].…”

Section: Surface Plots Of Tool Livessupporting

confidence: 92%

“…The corresponding S/N ratio values of the cutting tools PVDMNC and PECVD have been tabulated in table 2. Kondo et al [18] have also analyzed the S/N ratio values of the PVDMNC cutting tool in an experimental study and the results are agreed with the values mentioned in table 2. The results related to the PECVD cutting tool validated the results obtained by Muthuraja et al [13].…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

“…Hence the surface roughness of TiAlN-PVDMNC is better than TiAlSiN-PECVD due to the deposition of nanoparticles on the sharp edge corners of the cutting tools. Kondo et al[18] have observed a similar pattern of surface texture in a detailed manner. The quantum well, wire and bulk nanoparticles accumulated on the sharp edges of PVDMNC cutting tools that give smooth surface on turning.…”

mentioning

confidence: 71%

“…The wear rate of the TiAlN-PVDMNC and TiAlSiN-PECVD carbide cutting tools and surface roughness of the AISI 416 material are shown in table 6. From figure 11 it is observed that maximum flank wear occurred for both the cutting tools when the cutting speed is reduced less than 47.12 m min −1 because of high friction between flank and work surface [13,18]. It is also seen that the flank wear of the TiAlSiN-PECVD cutting tool is comparatively less than the TiAlN-PVDMNC cutting tool at medium (70.69 m min −1 ) as well as higher (102.10 m min −1 ) cutting speeds [13].…”

Section: Flank Wear Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kumar et al [17] explained the wear behavior and surface finish of TiAlN coated carbide cutting tools. Kondo et al [18] reveal the surface roughness, wear of TiAlSiN PVD coated cutting tools and concluded that it has a good surface and wear properties. Sui et al [19] evaluated the performance properties of TiAlN/ TiAlSiN composite coated cutting tools.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Experimental and theoretical analysis of tool life between plasma enhanced CVD and PVD multilayer nanocoated cutting tools

Calaph¹,

Subramanian²,

Stalin

et al. 2020

Mater. Res. Express

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tool life of the traditional cutting tools is comparatively lesser on machining the martensitic stainless steel AISI 416 which is one of the hardest materials. In order to increase the tool life, wear-resistant nanocoatings on the cutting tools have been explored. This study enunciates a comparison of tool life between PECVD (plasma-enhanced CVD multilayer nanocoated) and PVDMNC (PVD multilayer nanocoated) cutting tools on turning a martensitic stainless steel AISI 416 by experimental and theoretical investigations in addition to exploration of the machinability studies of cutting tool flank wear, tool hardness and surface roughness of work material. An orthogonal design, signal-to-noise ratio and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) methods were employed to confirm the parameters like cutting speed, tool hardness and feed rate that are involved in the study to estimate the cutting toollife. The investigations confirmed that cutting speed was the most dominant factor in determining tool life while comparing with other parameters. It was observed from the ANOVA results that the cutting speed, tool hardness, and feed rate have contributed 41.44%, 33.79%, and 24.35% respectively in determining the tool life of PECVD cutting tools whereas the contributions of the same parameters were found to be 40.01%, 32.90%, and 26.63% respectively for PVDMNC cutting tool. It is evident from the results that the cutting performance of the PECVD cutting tool is superior in terms of cutting speed and hardness which were enhanced by 1.43% and 0.89% respectively in addition to lesser wear rate when compared to the performance of PVDMNC cutting tools. Nomenclature ANOVAAnalysis of variance F Feed rate (mm/min) CVD Chemical Vapor Deposition Process V Cutting speed (m/min) PVD Physical Vapor Deposition Process S/N ratio Signal-to-noise ratio PE Plasma Enhanced MS Means of squares DOC Depth of cut DF Degree of freedom F va The value of variance T Tool life HV Hardness value by Vickers

show abstract

Section: Surface Plots Of Tool Livessupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

mentioning

confidence: 71%