2008
DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.25.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cutting the Gordian knot: taking a stab at corky root rot of tomato

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the prohibition of soil fumigation with methyl bromide and high costs of grafting plants restrict the availability of these control methods. No resistant cultivars are commonly available in spite of the determination of resistant sources to this pathogen on tomato plants (Bubici et al 2006;Ekengren 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the prohibition of soil fumigation with methyl bromide and high costs of grafting plants restrict the availability of these control methods. No resistant cultivars are commonly available in spite of the determination of resistant sources to this pathogen on tomato plants (Bubici et al 2006;Ekengren 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is pathogenic to tomato and other agronomically important Solanaceous species [ 1 , 2 ]. The pathogen is the agent of Corky Root Rot (CRR), a disease widespread especially under intensive tomato production systems and in greenhouse, with yield losses of 30–40% or more [ 3 , 4 ]. The pathogen attacks the main root causing the typical corky aspect, but the disease, especially in the field, tends to be underestimated, due to the lack of significant symptoms on the aerial parts of the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of commercial varieties are susceptible to P. lycopersici and sources of partial genetic resistances occur only in wild tomato species [ 6 ]. The use of susceptible cultivars combined with continuous cropping and the lack of effective soil treatments has encouraged the rapid spread of CRR disease resulting in fruit yield losses of up to 75% [ 7 , 8 ]. The sequencing of 18S nrDNA (SSU) and 28S nrDNA (LSU) indicate that P. lycopersici is an ascomycete in the order Pleosporales, along with other necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic plant pathogens representing genera such as Cochliobolus, Pyrenophora, Phaeosphaeria, Leptosphaeria, Pleospora, Phoma and Didymella [ 9 ] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%