2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CVD-synthesis of multiwall carbon nanotubes over potassium-doped supported catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various oxides can be used as support or as structural promoter to enhance the dispersion of the active phase such as Co nanoparticles and to improve the yield of CNTs [12][13][14][15][16]. The catalytic system for CNT synthesis can be considered as sacrificial catalyst, where both the active phase and the oxidic components remain in the product as impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various oxides can be used as support or as structural promoter to enhance the dispersion of the active phase such as Co nanoparticles and to improve the yield of CNTs [12][13][14][15][16]. The catalytic system for CNT synthesis can be considered as sacrificial catalyst, where both the active phase and the oxidic components remain in the product as impurities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main results were achieved in the time dependent studies; first one is that the increase in the yield of CNF formation during the 20 min interval of CVD formation and from that point forward the formation rate does not change, second one is that there is stability in terms of product yield at this temperature which showed in the rage of 40% to 100%. Actually the yield of the CNF/CNT deposition for Zn tartrate found was comparable to the well-known catalysts such as Fe and Co (24,25). Thus this is another decision on Zn as an effective catalyst for CNF/CNT formation through CVD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, the ubiquitous horizontal fixed bed, favoured for its low cost and simplicity, is a major bottleneck in high throughput experimental work because it is labour intensive and the unnecessarily large reactor volumes used result in slow heating and cooling and yield location specific product [2]. Increasing throughput in fixed bed is difficult as experiments cannot be run in series due to the effects of the upstream reactions [3], and increasing parallel throughput [4] enlarges reactor volume and introduces homogeneous gas distribution problems. Finally, traditional fixed beds provide very little real-time growth data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%