1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1223(98)00753-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanide and metal pollution by urban snowmelt: Impact of deicing compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of several trace elements were also elevated above background, particularly lithium (Li + ), which is present at over 6 times the background concentration at Site 7 (Table S2, Figure e). Increased trace element concentrations in surface waters may be due to mobilization from sediments by the wastewater-derived inorganic salts, similar to what has been observed for roadside soils impacted by deicing salts. Increased concentrations of Cl – , Br – , Sr 2+ , and Ba 2+ have been found in Pennsylvania streams downstream from wastewater treatment plants. , Elevated Br – concentrations in UOG wastewaters can lead to increases in disinfection byproducts (DBP) downstream from wastewater treatment plants, however DBP were not observed at any of the sites sampled in the Wolf Creek tributary …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concentrations of several trace elements were also elevated above background, particularly lithium (Li + ), which is present at over 6 times the background concentration at Site 7 (Table S2, Figure e). Increased trace element concentrations in surface waters may be due to mobilization from sediments by the wastewater-derived inorganic salts, similar to what has been observed for roadside soils impacted by deicing salts. Increased concentrations of Cl – , Br – , Sr 2+ , and Ba 2+ have been found in Pennsylvania streams downstream from wastewater treatment plants. , Elevated Br – concentrations in UOG wastewaters can lead to increases in disinfection byproducts (DBP) downstream from wastewater treatment plants, however DBP were not observed at any of the sites sampled in the Wolf Creek tributary …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For example, increases in salinity due to deicing of roads are associated with disruptions in nitrogen cycling, likely due to alterations of microbial communities. , The alterations in sediment microbial communities at the downstream sites could impact nutrient cycling in the stream, highlighting the importance of understanding the link between microbial community structure and function in environments impacted by UOG wastewater releases. Increasing hardness and metal concentrations in ecosystems impacted by road salt were also shown to have toxic effects on aquatic organisms and terrestrial plants. ,, At Wolf Creek, organisms may be similarly impacted; similar components are elevated in stream waters due to disposal activities and wastewater inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in a controlled laboratory study, Mann et al (2011) found that acidic, laboratory-synthesized snow with added Cl − showed more Hg(II) free in melted snow fractions, and Hg in synthesized snow containing no salt at a neutral pH had a higher fraction bound to particulate matter. In soils with pH < 7, the presence of Cl − results in less binding of Hg to particles, and in neutral or basic environments, Hg binding to particles is not influenced by the presence of Cl − (Barrow and Cox 1992;Lumsdon et al 1995;Yin et al 1996;Novotny et al 1998). Road salt applied to snowpacks can cause the release of heavy metals bound to organic matter in the soil under the snowpack due to the presence of high Cl − concentrations (Backstrom et al 2004).…”
Section: Halogens and Halogen Radicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers studied concentrations of pollutants in urban snow (Malmquist 1978;Jervis et al 1982;Viklander 1999;Reinosdotter and Viklander 2005;Sillanpää and Koivusalo 2013;Kuoppamäki et al 2014;Siudek et al 2015) and/or assessed the environmental impacts of snow disposal into the receiving waters (Novotny et al 1998;Engelhard et al 2007;Corsi et al 2010). However, none of those studies addressed the sampling of urban snow piles for a robust estimation of stored pollutant loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%