1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf01027416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanide and thiocyanate levels in blood and urine of workers with low-grade exposure to cyanide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be the reason why Maehly and Swensson (1970) were unable to correlate the blood levels of thiocyanate with the cyanide concentration in the air. The mean values of this metabolite in the second half of the working week during two successive months, were plotted against the mean values of the concentrations of cyanides in air during the same period.…”
Section: Haematological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be the reason why Maehly and Swensson (1970) were unable to correlate the blood levels of thiocyanate with the cyanide concentration in the air. The mean values of this metabolite in the second half of the working week during two successive months, were plotted against the mean values of the concentrations of cyanides in air during the same period.…”
Section: Haematological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions in the summary of the recommended AEGL levels utilize these studies as supporting studies. Thus, an absence of any mention of health effects becomes a positive assertion that none exist and the existence of any sampling data is transformed into average full shift personal data: ''additional monitoring studies with mean exposures to 5 ppm failed to report adverse health effects [Hardy et al, 1950;Maehly and Swensson, 1970].'' The studies are then used to justify the finding that 5 ppm exposures were investigated and no health effects resulted: ''dividing the 8-hr 5 ppm concentration of the Grabois [1954], Hardy et al [1950], or Maehly and Swensson [1970] studies by an intraspecies uncertainty factor of 3 or dividing the 1-hr 8 ppm concentration of the El Ghawabi et al [1975] study by an intraspecies uncertainty factor of three results in very similar AEGL 1 values.''…”
Section: Aegl Committee Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continued use by the AEGL committee of studies with no health effects investigation for AEGL-1 determination would be a poor practice, inappropriate, and antiquated. By adding the Grabois [1954], Hardy et al [1950], and Maehly and Swensson [1970] studies this AEGL risk methodology may best be characterized as a weight-of-no-evidence consideration.…”
Section: Aegl Committee Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations