A series of cobalt(III)–peroxo complexes, [CoIII(R2-TBDAP)(O2)]+ (1
R2
; R2 = Cl, H, and OMe),
and
cobalt(III)–hydroperoxo complexes, [CoIII(R2-TBDAP)(O2H)(CH3CN)]2+ (2
R2
), bearing electronically tuned
tetraazamacrocyclic ligands (R2-TBDAP = N,N′-di-tert-butyl-2,11-diaza[3.3](2,6)-p-R2-pyridinophane) were prepared from their
cobalt(II) precursors and characterized by various physicochemical
methods. The X-ray diffraction and spectroscopic analyses unambiguously
showed that all 1
R2
compounds
have similar octahedral geometry with a side-on peroxocobalt(III)
moiety, but the O–O bond lengths of 1
Cl
[1.398(3) Å] and 1
OMe
[1.401(4) Å] were shorter than that of 1
H
[1.456(3) Å] due to the different
spin states. For 2
R2
, the O–O
bond vibration energies of 2
Cl
and 2
OMe
were identical at
853 cm–1 (856 cm–1 for 2
H
), but their Co–O bond vibration
frequencies were observed at 572 cm–1 for 2
Cl
and 550 cm–1 for 2
OMe
, respectively, by
resonance Raman spectroscopy (560 cm–1 for 2
H
). Interestingly, the redox potentials
(E
1/2) of 2
R2
increased in the order of 2
OMe
(0.19 V) < 2
H
(0.24
V) < 2
Cl
(0.34 V) according
to the electron richness of the R2-TBDAP ligands, but the
oxygen-atom-transfer reactivities of 2
R2
showed a reverse trend (k
2: 2
Cl
< 2
H
< 2
OMe
) with
a 13-fold rate enhancement at 2
OMe
over 2
Cl
in a sulfoxidation
reaction with thioanisole. Although the reactivity trend contradicts
the general consideration that electron-rich metal–oxygen species
with low E
1/2 values have sluggish electrophilic
reactivity, this could be explained by a weak Co–O bond vibration
of 2
OMe
in the unusual reaction
pathway. These results provide considerable insight into the electronic
nature–reactivity relationship of metal–oxygen species.