2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyanobacterial Polyketide Synthase Docking Domains: A Tool for Engineering Natural Product Biosynthesis

Abstract: SUMMARY Modular type I polyketide synthases (PKSs) are versatile biosynthetic systems that initiate, successively elongate and modify acyl chains. Intermediate transfer between modules is mediated via docking domains, which are attractive targets for PKS pathway engineering to produce novel small molecules. We identified a Class 2 docking domain in cyanobacterial PKSs and determined crystal structures for two docking domain pairs, revealing a novel docking strategy for promoting intermediate transfer. The sele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
190
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
14
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Nor is the ACP D docking site on HMGS analogous to either of the ACP-KS docking sites observed in cryo-EM maps of a PKS module (19). We find no evidence of a second active site entrance in the HMGS structure (for example, poorly ordered loops that could expose the active site, as in the KS) (19,21,35,36). We conclude that ACP A and ACP D insert acyl-Ppant through the same active site entrance, as do the donor and acceptor-CoAs of HMGCS, but that the ACPs interact with different regions of the HMGS surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nor is the ACP D docking site on HMGS analogous to either of the ACP-KS docking sites observed in cryo-EM maps of a PKS module (19). We find no evidence of a second active site entrance in the HMGS structure (for example, poorly ordered loops that could expose the active site, as in the KS) (19,21,35,36). We conclude that ACP A and ACP D insert acyl-Ppant through the same active site entrance, as do the donor and acceptor-CoAs of HMGCS, but that the ACPs interact with different regions of the HMGS surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A critical question is whether the ACPs engage HMGS simultaneously or sequentially. The affinity of HMGS for ACP D is tenfold greater than a native docking domain pair (K d = 0.5 μM vs. 5-25 μM) (20,21). HMGS has lower affinity for ACP A than for ACP D , based on the K d of 150-200 μM for the bryostatin HMGS and its cognate ACP A (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pieces incorporating both PKS and NRPS modules are of particular interest, given the reported differences in their oligomerization states 16,18 . In terms of communication across intersubunit interfaces (in trans), key insights have emerged from the structures of excised 'docking domains' [42][43][44] . However, it will be important in future to visualize several more complete interfaces comprising not only the docking elements but also the flanking domains, as achieved for Pik module 5 (ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It took over a decade to complete the catalog of commonly found domain structures from cis-AT PKSs, which were solved either by X-ray crystallography (didomain KS-AT 27,28 , KR 29-35 , DH 36,37 and didomain KR-ER 33 ) or, in the case of the ACPs 38-40 , by NMR. Other fragments characterized at high resolution include a region lying between the AT and KR domains of many PKS modules, which appears to serve as an internal dimerization motif 41 , and short sequences at the extreme C-and N-terminal ends of the subunits (referred to as 'docking domains'), which function as intermolecular recognition elements [42][43][44] .…”
Section: The Dissection Approach To Studying Functional Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%