Cyber-aggression in adolescence and internet parenting styles: A study with victims, perpetrators and victim-perpetrators

Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review

“…From this study, it was also concluded that permissive and indulgent parents were more likely to have children who bully other students (cyber and traditional bullying perpetration was included). Vale et al (2018) achieved results similar to those of the above-mentioned authors, stating that laissez-faire parenting affected adolescents' cyber-involvement. Their findings also indicated that children in the non-violent group were more likely to perceive their parents' style of parenting as authoritative and authoritarian, and victim-perpetrators as permissive and laissez-faire.…”

“…The works studied analyzing the influence of parental educational styles on cyberbullying perpetration and victimization (Charalampous et al 2018;Garaigordobil and Machimbarrena 2017;Govender and Young 2018;Shams et al 2017;Vale et al 2018;Zurcher et al 2018) focused mainly on authoritarian and permissive styles. On the one hand, Govender and Young (2018), Shams et al (2017), andZurcher et al (2018) agree that the authoritarian educational style has a positive relationship with cyberbullying perpetration.…”

“…On the one hand, Govender and Young (2018), Shams et al (2017), andZurcher et al (2018) agree that the authoritarian educational style has a positive relationship with cyberbullying perpetration. On the other hand, Garaigordobil and Machimbarrena (2017), Shams et al (2017), and Vale et al (2018) concur that there is a relationship between the permissive style and cybervictimization. A single study provided information on the authoritative style (Zurcher et al 2018), which seems of great interest because of its negative relationship with the cyberbullying perpetration.…”

“…al. 2017;Boniel-Nissim and Sasson 2018;Charalampous et al 2018;Chen et al 2018;Doty et al 2017;Giménez et al 2017;Gómez et al 2017;Govender and Young 2018;Ho et al 2017;Hong et al 2018;Hood and Duffy 2018;Larrañaga et al 2016;Lee and Shin 2017;Mobin et al 2017;Sasson and Mesch 2017;Stavrinides et al 2018;Vale et al 2018;Vazsonyi et al 2017;Wright 2017;Zurcher et al 2018). However, there were 6 more studies (17%) which took into account dynamic variables(Bevilacqua et al 2017;Beyazit et al 2017;Buelga et al 2017;Garaigordobil and Machimbarrena 2017;Le et al 2017;Shams et al 2017).…”

Being a cybervictim and a cyberbully – The duality of cyberbullying: A meta-analysis

“…Three clear groups can be discerned: those on the left (7 with lower Z-values), those on the right (7 with higher Z-values) and those inside or on the edges of the cone. In the last case, we can see that some studies are in the middle of the structure but always inside it or at its edge; these studies present a higher standard error (Chen et al, 2019;Lee & Shin, 2017& Vale et al, 2018. In regard to the group of studies on the right, we must remember that the transformation they underwent was x>0.5 when the normal curve was converted into the Fisher curve, which moved these observations away from the mean values.…”