2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberdermatoethics I: ethical, legal, technologic, and clinical aspects of patient-physician e-mail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a literature review revealed that e-consultations are generally valued by patients who deem them to improve convenience and access, facilitate more detailed informational exchanges, and provide freedom from the medical gaze, although patients have also expressed concerns about security and delays in response (Fage-Butler & Nisbeth Jensen, 2015). Doctors, on the other hand, see e-consultations as having the potential to promote the doctor-patient relationship, but have expressed concern about increased workload, security issues, ethical issues, inappropriate use of email by patients, lack of reimbursement as well as the quality of the health outcomes deriving from e-consultations (Albersheim, 2010;Antoun, 2016;Luo, Logan, Long, & Bercovitch, 2009;Mold et al, 2019;Ye, Rust, Fry-Johnson, & Strothers, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a literature review revealed that e-consultations are generally valued by patients who deem them to improve convenience and access, facilitate more detailed informational exchanges, and provide freedom from the medical gaze, although patients have also expressed concerns about security and delays in response (Fage-Butler & Nisbeth Jensen, 2015). Doctors, on the other hand, see e-consultations as having the potential to promote the doctor-patient relationship, but have expressed concern about increased workload, security issues, ethical issues, inappropriate use of email by patients, lack of reimbursement as well as the quality of the health outcomes deriving from e-consultations (Albersheim, 2010;Antoun, 2016;Luo, Logan, Long, & Bercovitch, 2009;Mold et al, 2019;Ye, Rust, Fry-Johnson, & Strothers, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type of disease Diabetes, blood pressure [5,32,36], asthma [32,36], cardiovascular [11,20,32,36], Psoriasis [20], allergy, high cholesterol, depression [11, 36] 3 Type of specialty General practitioner and family physician [23,35,36], primary care practitioner [7,12,13,16,25,26,28,30,36,37,39,40], surgeon [12,16,23,36], internist [16,36], gynecologist [5,16,28], neurologist, emergency specialist, psychiatrist [28], pediatrician [26, 35-37] 4 Email subject in relation between physician and patient Laboratory resources [35][36][37], criticism and acknowledgment [22], nutritional modification interactive program (smoking cessation and weight loss ) [13,32] Obtaining health information in order to prevent diseases [32,35,…”
Section: Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare quality improvement and the ability to add information to patients health record [15,18,20] Repayments by patients and increasing the costs [20, 31, 35] 2 Saving physician and patient time [25,28,32] Required time to answer patients' email [27, 28, 40] 3 Increasing the patients' incorporation in medical decisions making [5,6,12,18,20,32] Increasing workload [37][38][39][40] 4…”
Section: Row Advantageous Disadvantageousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations