Extant research has suggested United States (U.S.) higher education is more accessible and equitable toward Whites than toward English-language learners, international students, and students of color (Taylor, 2017(Taylor, , 2018a(Taylor, , 2018b. In this empirical essay, I argue these issues of access and equity is partially owed to the Anglocentric, highly routinized, and luddite nature of U.S. higher education communication, policy, and practice. Moreover, I forward the notion that predominantly-English institutions (PEIs) should explore performing non-routine, highlytechnological work in order to value the linguistic capital (Yosso, 2005) brought to the institution by students with diverse language knowledge in order to truly serve students from minoritized language populations.