2017
DOI: 10.1108/dprg-05-2017-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cybersecurity governance: a prehistory and its implications

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the emerging challenges of cybersecurity governance by analyzing the internet’s early history. Design/methodology/approach Tracing the design and management of early internet and network security technologies in the USA in the 1970s and 1980s. Findings The US Department of Defense separated the research and management regimes for networks and network security, with the latter restricted to military networks. As such, the absence of cybersecurity technologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, two reports on space asset threats by Harrison et al have pointed out the dangers posed by attacks [68], [69]. Ultimately, there is a plethora of additional research on this topic, albeit of theoretic nature [70]- [73] or involving simulations [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, two reports on space asset threats by Harrison et al have pointed out the dangers posed by attacks [68], [69]. Ultimately, there is a plethora of additional research on this topic, albeit of theoretic nature [70]- [73] or involving simulations [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the scope of this research is the macrolevel perspective of the cybersecurity ecosystem, e.g., governance issues concerning the sociopolitical environment and its overarching systems, structures, and policies that govern a society, nation, or global community regarding security (Fidler, 2017;Cavelty & Smeets, 2023). Nor does this research investigate the microlevel of DSG, e.g., the interactions of individuals regarding DSG, such as compliance and how individuals adhere to established policies, procedures, and ethical standards.…”
Section: Scope and Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%