2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22239211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cybersecurity Testing for Automotive Domain: A Survey

Abstract: Modern vehicles are more complex and interconnected than ever before, which also means that attack surfaces for vehicles have increased significantly. Malicious cyberattacks will not only exploit personal privacy and property, but also affect the functional safety of electrical/electronic (E/E) safety-critical systems by controlling the driving functionality, which is life-threatening. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct cybersecurity testing on vehicles to reveal and address relevant security threats and vu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined in Section I, a main drawbacks of the current security testing process is the complexity of modern vehicles, late and manual testing techniques, such as penetration testing, and the challenge of identifying vulnerabilities as early as possible through testing. Existing surveys on (model-based) security testing, such as the work of Mahmood et al [63], Luo et al [64], and Pekaric et al [65] often refer to penetration testing and dynamic analysis techniques (e.g., fuzzing and vulnerability scanning) that do not support early vulnerability testing and can only be applied late in the development cycle. Surveys, such as the work of Altinger et al [15] and Kriebel et al [17], suggest that model-based testing addresses these challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As outlined in Section I, a main drawbacks of the current security testing process is the complexity of modern vehicles, late and manual testing techniques, such as penetration testing, and the challenge of identifying vulnerabilities as early as possible through testing. Existing surveys on (model-based) security testing, such as the work of Mahmood et al [63], Luo et al [64], and Pekaric et al [65] often refer to penetration testing and dynamic analysis techniques (e.g., fuzzing and vulnerability scanning) that do not support early vulnerability testing and can only be applied late in the development cycle. Surveys, such as the work of Altinger et al [15] and Kriebel et al [17], suggest that model-based testing addresses these challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, four methods that can be used for security testing are described: penetration testing, fuzz testing, vulnerability scanning, and model-based security testing. Luo et al [64] examine security testing methods that are used in the automotive sector. The authors distinguish between knowledge-based, automation-based, threat-based, risk-based, requirement-based, and model-based security testing.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assist in automating security testing processes, identifying security weaknesses, and ensuring adherence to established security standards [199][200][201]. Security testing frameworks provide a structured and systematic approach to evaluate the security posture of automotive systems [202][203][204][205].…”
Section: Security Testing Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed security indexing approach is developed based on BC and deep autoencoder clustering (DAC) concepts with a focus on balancing system efficiency and reliability. Most security assessment or testing approaches count on burdensome computation, which are impractical for VANET devices owing to the resource limitation [67]. But still, features for security assessment can involve numerous concerns, and Indexing function provides prompt on-site index generation based on device reported features.…”
Section: Security Indexingmentioning
confidence: 99%