Cybersemiotics: An Evolutionary World View Going Beyond Entropy and Information into the Question of Meaning

Abstract

Abstract：What makes Cybersemiotics different from other approaches attempting to produce a transdisciplinary theory of information, cognition and communication is its absolute naturalism, which forces us to view life, consciousness and cultural meaning all as a part of nature and evolution. It thus opposes a number of orthodoxies: 1. The physico-chemical scientific paradigm based on third person objective empirical knowledge and mathematical theory, but with no conceptions of experiental life, meaning and first person embodied consciousness and therefore meaningful linguistic intersubjectivity; 2. The biological and natural historical science approach understood as the combination of genetic evolutionary theory with an ecological and thermodynamic view based on the evolution of experiental living systems as the ground fact and engaged in a search for empirical truth, yet doing so without a theory of meaning and first person embodied consciousness and thereby linguistic meaningful intersubjectivity; 3. The linguistic-cultural-social structuralist constructivism that sees all knowledge as constructions of meaning produced by the intersubjective web of language, cultural mentality and power, but with no concept of empirical truth, life, evolution, ecology and a very weak concept of subjective embodied first person consciousness even while taking conscious intersubjective communication and knowledge processes as the basic fact to study (the linguistic turn); 4. Any approach which takes the qualitative distinction between subject and object as the ground fact, on which all meaningful knowledge is based, considering all result of the sciences including linguistics and embodiment of consciousness as secondary knowledge, as opposed to a phenomenological (Husserl) or actually phaneroscopic (Peirce) first person point of view considering conscious meaningful experiences in advance of the subject/object distinction. The phaneroscopic semiotics includes an intersubjective base as Peirce considers all knowledge as intersubjectively produced through signs and view emotions and qualia as Firstness. The integrative transdisciplinary synthesis of Cybersemiotics starts by accepting OPEN ACCESSEntropy 2010, 12 1903 two major, but not fully explanatory, and very different transdisciplinary paradigms: 1. The second order cybernetic and autopoietic approach united in Luhmann"s triple autopoietic system theory of social communication; 2. The Peircean phaneroscopic, triadic, pragmaticistic, evolutionary, semiotic approach to meaning, which has led to modern biosemiotics, based in a phenomenological intersubjective world of partly self-organizing triadic sign processes in an experiental meaningful world. The two are integrated by inserting the modern development of information theory and self-organizing emergent chemico-biological phenomena as an aspect of a general semiotic evolution in the Peircean framework. This creates the Cybersemiotic framework, where evolutionary experiental and intersubjective sign processes become the ground r...

Cybersemiotics and Human Modelling

“…As part of this project Brier suggests ( [5] p. 141) that knowing might encompass such practices as art, religion and politics/ideology. More recent work in cybersemiotics [13] has been circumspect about this suggestion, but there are many who would seek to elevate religion, at least, to the status of a ‗knowing'. Another conclusion arising from cybersemiotics is that if our knowledge is so limited in relation to the ‗simple' action of raising an arm, then we have to be careful with figuring the knowing of other organisms.…”

“…Indeed, -Motivation seems to be an intention just below the level of consciousness‖ ( [5] p. 345), an occurrence which prevented von Uexküll building it into his theoretical framework, but which corresponds to a range of investigations and theories about cognitive functions, from Freud's positing of the ‗pre-conscious' to -the well known experiments showing that decisions of actions seem to be made on a level below consciousness, and a few seconds before we become aware of them‖ ([5] p. 428). In more recent work [13], cybersemiotics has made use of the work of Damasio, a potentially important thinker for both semiotics and cybernetics. Descartes' Error, for example, is dedicated inter alia to exploring how -The organism actively modifies itself so that ... interfacing [with the environment] can take place as well as possible‖ ([2] p. 225).…”

Paradigms of Cognition

“…A difficulty with (20) concerns the possible indeterminate form ∞ − ∞. If we ignore the difficulty and apply the linking identity (16) to both terms in (20), entropy H(x) cancels out and we find the expression…”

Deepening the Conception of Functional Information in the Description of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases

“…Brier formulated principles of "cybersemiotics" as an evolutionary approach going beyond entropy and information into the question of meaning [104]. The term "information" is often used in a narrow sense as a degree of non-randomness or as a sequence of characters in DNA, but Sharov [105] cites the words of Bateson, "… information is a difference which makes a difference".…”