Deterring Cyber Warfare 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137476180_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyberspace and Cyber Warfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 Furthermore, in this “Third Nuclear Age,” 47 some have argued that deterrence postures need to consider both military and nonmilitary options, especially since the symmetrical situations of mutual deterrence that shaped U.S.-Soviet relations have been replaced by asymmetric threats such as terrorism, cyberwarfare, and revisionist states. 48,49 Therefore, according to Admiral James Stavridis, U.S. national security is now, more than ever, faced with a convergence of threats. The “darker side of globalization,” as Admiral Stavridis puts it, has caused a “merger of a wide variety of mobile human activities, each of which is individually dangerous and whose sum represents a far greater threat.” 50 In this sense, deterrence theory and strategy must not only account for traditional interstate conflict but also the different organizational structures and leadership characteristics of a diverse set of new actors.…”
Section: Overview Of the Current Deterrence Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 Furthermore, in this “Third Nuclear Age,” 47 some have argued that deterrence postures need to consider both military and nonmilitary options, especially since the symmetrical situations of mutual deterrence that shaped U.S.-Soviet relations have been replaced by asymmetric threats such as terrorism, cyberwarfare, and revisionist states. 48,49 Therefore, according to Admiral James Stavridis, U.S. national security is now, more than ever, faced with a convergence of threats. The “darker side of globalization,” as Admiral Stavridis puts it, has caused a “merger of a wide variety of mobile human activities, each of which is individually dangerous and whose sum represents a far greater threat.” 50 In this sense, deterrence theory and strategy must not only account for traditional interstate conflict but also the different organizational structures and leadership characteristics of a diverse set of new actors.…”
Section: Overview Of the Current Deterrence Debatementioning
confidence: 99%