1997
DOI: 10.2514/2.4131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycle Ambiguity Estimation for Aircraft Precision Landing Using the Global Positioning System

Abstract: Measurements of the Global Positioning System carrier phase can provide the basis for the highest level of satellite-based navigation performance. In particular, the potential exists to exceed even the stringent navigation requirements for aircraft precision approach and landing. The principal dif culty in this use of carrier phase, however, lies in the real-time, high-integrity resolution of the unknown integer cycle ambiguities. A new methodology is introduced, using carrier phase measurements from ground-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 It follows from Eq. (15) that the integrity risk can be expressed as a product of probabilities:…”
Section: Integrity Risk Evaluation For Batch-immentioning
confidence: 98%
“…35,36 It follows from Eq. (15) that the integrity risk can be expressed as a product of probabilities:…”
Section: Integrity Risk Evaluation For Batch-immentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A practical way to bring this about is to use ground-based GPS satellites, or pseudolites, that the aircraft overflies to cause the geometry change. The mathematics underlying this technique are beyond the scope of this work, but an excellent description of the process may be found in Pervan and Parkinson (1997). An important constraint in using on-the-fly algorithms is that two pseudolites are needed for a solution "along and cross-track."…”
Section: Global Positioning System Ambiguity Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This derivation follows from [28]. Recalling the definition of WSSE or α 2 , one can write Replacing H * k with H * k y, because it lies in the range of H * k , one obtains the following:…”
Section: Appendix a Proof That The Fault Detection Test Statistic Anmentioning
confidence: 99%