2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2007.04698
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycle Extendability of Hamiltonian Strongly Chordal Graphs

Abstract: In 1990, Hendry conjectured that all Hamiltonian chordal graphs are cycle extendable. After a series of papers confirming the conjecture for a number of graph classes, the conjecture is yet refuted by Lafond and Seamone in 2015. Given that their counterexamples are not strongly chordal graphs and they are all only 2-connected, Lafond and Seamone asked the following two questions:(1) Are Hamiltonian strongly chordal graphs cycle extendable? (2) Is there an integer k such that all k-connected Hamiltonian chordal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3, we examine ways in which we can modify the construction given in Section 2 to obtain examples which satisfy even stronger conditions in terms of induced path lengths (improving on a result from [10]), connectivity (answering a question from [10], S-extendibility (answering a conjecture from [3]), and underlying tree structure (showing that results in [1] are almost best possible). Note that similar results to some of those presented in Sections 2 and 3 were independently obtained by Rong et al [13]. Finally, we propose an extremal problem in Section 4 related to our counterexample constructions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In Section 3, we examine ways in which we can modify the construction given in Section 2 to obtain examples which satisfy even stronger conditions in terms of induced path lengths (improving on a result from [10]), connectivity (answering a question from [10], S-extendibility (answering a conjecture from [3]), and underlying tree structure (showing that results in [1] are almost best possible). Note that similar results to some of those presented in Sections 2 and 3 were independently obtained by Rong et al [13]. Finally, we propose an extremal problem in Section 4 related to our counterexample constructions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%