2020
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202000012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Aminosilane‐Based Additive Ensuring Stable Electrode–Electrolyte Interfaces in Li‐Ion Batteries

Abstract: Ni‐rich cathodes are considered feasible candidates for high‐energy‐density Li‐ion batteries (LIBs). However, the structural degradation of Ni‐rich cathodes on the micro‐ and nanoscale leads to severe capacity fading, thereby impeding their practical use in LIBs. Here, it is reported that 3‐(trimethylsilyl)‐2‐oxazolidinone (TMS‐ON) as a multifunctional additive promotes the dissociation of LiPF6, prevents the hydrolysis of ion‐paired LiPF6 (which produces undesired acidic compounds including HF), and scavenges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. The resulting solution was filtered and then analyzed by 31 P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (400 MHz, Bruker Avance 3HD) with a tetrahydrofuran (THF)- d 8 NMR solvent. The cross-sectional samples for the observation of microcracking of the PC-NCM811 particles were prepared by an ion-milling system (HITACHI IM4000) . Moreover, the phase transition of the PC-NCM811 particle was observed by STEM (JEM-2100Fm JEOL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solution was stirred at 25 °C for 24 h. The resulting solution was filtered and then analyzed by 31 P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (400 MHz, Bruker Avance 3HD) with a tetrahydrofuran (THF)- d 8 NMR solvent. The cross-sectional samples for the observation of microcracking of the PC-NCM811 particles were prepared by an ion-milling system (HITACHI IM4000) . Moreover, the phase transition of the PC-NCM811 particle was observed by STEM (JEM-2100Fm JEOL).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sectional samples for micro-cracking observation of NCM811 cathode were processed by the ion milling method (Hitachi IM4000). [36] Furthermore, the structural change of NCM811 was detected by STEM (JEM-2100Fm JEOL). Electronic energy loss spectrophotometric measurements were made to examine the transformation in the cathode structure with the valence state of Mn, Ni and Co. VSP-300 Galvanostats and potentistat were used to measure total cell impedances.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the doping of Ni only slightly alters the bulk chemistry of the LCO cathode materials. It mainly presents surface effects, such as mitigating the formation of CEI and initiating phase transformation in the near-surface region, and those were usually ignored in the past. First, the O 2 -type LCO cathode materials render high specific capacity and Li + and electronic conductivities; therefore, it is not clear why the transition of bulk phase inevitably causes capacity fading . Second, the strategy of surface coating has been usually employed to ameliorate the electrochemical property of the LCO cathode materials.…”
Section: Lattice Oxygen Redox Reaction Mechanisms Of Conventional Lay...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 ] Compared with surface modification, electrolyte additive is a more economical and effective method to improve the interface stability of LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 cathode. [ 9 ] At present, different film‐forming additives including trifluoromethyl sulfide (PTS), [9d] 1,1‐sulfonyldiimidazole (SDM), [ 10 ] allyloxytrimethylsilsilane (AMSL), [ 11 ] tris(pentafluorophenyl)silane (TPFPS), [ 12 ] (pentafluorophenyl)diphenylphosphine (PFPDPP), [ 13 ] p‐toluenesulfonyl isocyanate (PTSI), [ 14 ] tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (TPFPB), [ 15 ] 3‐(trimethylsilyl)‐2‐oxazolidinone (TMS‐ON), [ 16 ] and so on have been used to improve the interface stability of the LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 , but it finds that some film‐forming additives also increase the interface resistance, which is harmful to the rate performance of the cells. [ 10,17 ] To compare with aforementioned film‐forming additives, using a monomer of a conductive polymer as a film‐forming additive is a more effective method to improve the interface stability because it can not only effectively protect the surface of cathode, but also improve the rate performance of cells by its excellent conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%