2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic behaviour of unreinforced and rib-reinforced moment connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to develop a better understanding of the cyclic behaviour of typical steel moment resisting connections, three WUF, RBS and DF test specimens are considered from previous experimental studies [21][22][23][24] as shown in Fig 1. The detailed properties of the selected test specimens are presented in Table 1. [24], and (c) DF connection [21,22] d1, d2, d3 are hole diameters in the DF connection (see Fig 1-c) d/e/f are electrode type, bevel angle (degree) and weld root diameter (mm), respectively.…”
Section: Reference Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to develop a better understanding of the cyclic behaviour of typical steel moment resisting connections, three WUF, RBS and DF test specimens are considered from previous experimental studies [21][22][23][24] as shown in Fig 1. The detailed properties of the selected test specimens are presented in Table 1. [24], and (c) DF connection [21,22] d1, d2, d3 are hole diameters in the DF connection (see Fig 1-c) d/e/f are electrode type, bevel angle (degree) and weld root diameter (mm), respectively.…”
Section: Reference Experimental Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE models were generated using non-uniform meshes with local refinement in the regions with high stress concentration and holes. Bolts and shear tabs were not modelled in the FE model of the WUF and RBS test specimens, since no slippage was observed between the shear tab and the beam web in these connections [23][24]. The VonMises yielding criterion and multi-linear kinematic hardening plastic model [27] were used to model the plasticity and cyclic inelastic behaviour of steel material, respectively.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their fully commercial use in the early 1940s, spirals have proved to be a cost-effective and efficient method for concentrating a variety of ores [16,17]. In recent years, fine mineral spiral separators have been successfully used for processing ever-finer materials [18][19][20]. Due to the low settling velocities of very fine mineral particles, smaller bed depths and laminar flows are required for efficient separation [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that plastic rotations developed by the beams prior to connection failure were poor when all connections failed by fracture at or near the beam flange groove welds. In 2005, Chen and Cheng-Chih et al [5] investigated experimentally and numerically the cyclic behaviour of pre-Northridge connections. The experimental results explicitly revealed the brittle fracture of the beam flange, initiated from the root of the weld access hole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%