2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of XP-Endo Shaper, K3XF, and ProTaper Gold Nickel-titanium Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that XPS has excellent resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to WOG [19][20][21][22]. However, the torque at failure was found to be very low (0.84 ± 0.11 N·cm) [21] which is due to the file design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies showed that XPS has excellent resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to WOG [19][20][21][22]. However, the torque at failure was found to be very low (0.84 ± 0.11 N·cm) [21] which is due to the file design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…XPS achieves a final apical preparation of at least 30/0.04 [17][18][19]. XPS was found to have superior cyclic fatigue performance compared to other file systems [19][20][21][22]. WaveOne Gold (WOG; Dentsply Sirona, York, PA) system is an updated version of the WaveOne (WO; Dentsply Sirona) single-file system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results of the present study, the XP Endo-Finisher file exhibited a higher resistance to cyclic fatigue than the ProTaper Gold and 2Shape TS2 files at body temperature. No previous study has compared the cyclic fatigue among these files, though Keskin et al (29) have studied the XP-endo Shaper made from MaxWire alloy (cf. XP-endo Finisher) to exhibit a higher cyclic fatigue resistance than the ProTaper Gold and K3XF nickel-titanium rotary instruments at intracanal temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time to fracture was recorded using digital chronometer. Using the time data, the numbers of cycles to failure (NCFs) were calculated according to the following formula: NCFs = revolutions per minute x time to fracture (seconds)/60 (15,16,17) . Numerical data were explored for normality by checking the data distribution and using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%