2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic lateral load behavior of squat reinforced concrete walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The force-deformation relations (capacity curves on Figure 12) for the structural elements and acceptance criteria for the performance requirements were defined in accordance with Eurocode 8-3 [44], but considered also the guidelines provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [46][47][48], Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [49][50][51][52] and ASCE [45] for the derivation of the cyclic backbone curves. Furthermore, guidelines [53] and scientific papers presenting the experimental testing of walls (e.g., [54][55][56][57]) were considered for squat walls, because of the unreliability of their failure mechanisms and ductility calculation. Large structural redundancy causes significant robustness, although failure mechanisms of primary elements are mostly non-ductile shear failures, which was taken into account during analyses.…”
Section: Numerical Models and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force-deformation relations (capacity curves on Figure 12) for the structural elements and acceptance criteria for the performance requirements were defined in accordance with Eurocode 8-3 [44], but considered also the guidelines provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [46][47][48], Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [49][50][51][52] and ASCE [45] for the derivation of the cyclic backbone curves. Furthermore, guidelines [53] and scientific papers presenting the experimental testing of walls (e.g., [54][55][56][57]) were considered for squat walls, because of the unreliability of their failure mechanisms and ductility calculation. Large structural redundancy causes significant robustness, although failure mechanisms of primary elements are mostly non-ductile shear failures, which was taken into account during analyses.…”
Section: Numerical Models and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the baseline formulation of the SFI-MVLEM is used to simulate the behavior of the four medium-rise or relatively slender planar RC walls (aspect ratios ranging from 1.5 to 3.0) subjected to in-plane cyclic lateral loading (RW2, Thomsen and Wallace 1995;R2, Oesterle et al 1976;WSH6, Dazio et al 2009; RW-A15-P10-S78, Tran and Wallace 2015). The SFI-MVLEM-SQ is validated against test results obtained for three squat walls (aspect ratios equal to 0.33, 0.50, and 1.0), also tested under in-plane cyclic lateral loading (T5-S1, T2-S3, and T4-S1; Terzioglu et al 2018). The SFI-MVLEM-3D is verified against experimental data for two flanged (T-shaped, U-shaped) slender walls subjected to both uni-and multi-directional lateral loading (TW2, Thomsen and Wallace 1995;TUB, Beyer et al 2008).…”
Section: Description Of Test Specimens and Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of the SFI-MVLEM-SQ is evaluated using experimental results obtained from three planar squat specimens tested by Terzioglu et al (2018): (1) T5-S1 with aspect ratio of 1.0, (2) T2-S3 with aspect ratio of 0.5, and (3) T4-S1 with aspect ratio of 0.33. All three specimens experienced significant shear deformations contributing up to 35%, 75%, and 80% to the top lateral displacement of the walls, respectively, and failed in diagonal compression under combined shear and flexural effects.…”
Section: Validation Of Sfi-mvlem-sqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1 ] Properly designed and detailed structural walls possess the necessary strength, stiffness, and ductility characteristics to ensure life‐safety performance in a building subjected to a design‐level earthquake and to minimize damage on the structure during a service‐level earthquake. [ 2 ] Since the late 1980s, it has been common to use concrete walls with rectangular cross‐sections to optimize economy and design. Much more attentions have been paid to performance study of rectangular RC shear wall too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%