2020
DOI: 10.1111/jace.17117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic martensitic transformations and damage evolution in shape memory zirconia: Single crystals vs polycrystals

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 108 ] In addition, the comparison of 1.5 and 2.0 mol% yttria stabilized zirconia between single crystal and polycrystalline structure has been analyzed by Crystal et al. [ 109 ] Owing to high ductility, high specific strength, and inertness in harsh environments, SMC is expected to offer promising solutions to the soft actuation applications.…”
Section: Smart Materials Undergoing a Solid–solid Phase Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 108 ] In addition, the comparison of 1.5 and 2.0 mol% yttria stabilized zirconia between single crystal and polycrystalline structure has been analyzed by Crystal et al. [ 109 ] Owing to high ductility, high specific strength, and inertness in harsh environments, SMC is expected to offer promising solutions to the soft actuation applications.…”
Section: Smart Materials Undergoing a Solid–solid Phase Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the excellent SME/SE performances mentioned above are related to the small-scaling at the level of up to a few microns, based on the approach of eliminating grain boundaries. A recent study by Crystal et al [46] takes a step further by extending the strategy to mm-scale bulk size, in which mm-scale zirconia single crystals withstand cyclic martensitic transformation through 125 cycles without obvious degradation of the strain amplitude of * 3% and cracking. In comparison, the strain of a large zirconia polycrystal sample during the cyclic martensitic transformation is reduced to 1.5% after 10 cycles, and a large specimen mass loss of 35% was observed after 45 cycles due to the cracking.…”
Section: Sme Of Zro 2 At Small Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lai et al manufactured zirconia micro-pillars that are able to withstand dozens of transformation cycles at significant strain levels of several percent, indicating great improvement over polycrystalline superelastic zirconia [1]. Large (cm-scale) single crystals of SMC also exhibit highly reversible transformation behavior over many cycles [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of SMAs, previous work has investigated the tendency of Cu-based SMAs to fracture along grain boundaries due to strain incompatibilities there [16][17][18]. In SMCs, grain boundary strain incompatibility is less studied, although recent work has provided significant insights [9,[19][20][21]. Pang et al [19] investigated the two-dimensional compatibility of the martensiteaustenite interface via the application of the cofactor conditions as a possible factor controlling the cracking of bulk polycrystalline zirconia-based SMCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%