2000
DOI: 10.1007/s00897000416a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclic Voltammetry of Hexachloroiridate(IV): An Alternative to the Electrochemical Study of the Ferricyanide Ion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gold disk microelectrodes of different radii (r 0 ¼ 12. , which are in line with previous results in the literature (see [28,29]). We have also determined the formal potential of FeCl 3 from current reversal chronopotentiometric measures at a gold disk electrode of r 0 ¼ 5 Â 10 À2 cm by following the procedure indicated in [30], and obtaining the value E8' ¼ 0.508 AE 0.001 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), KCl 1.0 M, which is in line with results in [31].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gold disk microelectrodes of different radii (r 0 ¼ 12. , which are in line with previous results in the literature (see [28,29]). We have also determined the formal potential of FeCl 3 from current reversal chronopotentiometric measures at a gold disk electrode of r 0 ¼ 5 Â 10 À2 cm by following the procedure indicated in [30], and obtaining the value E8' ¼ 0.508 AE 0.001 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), KCl 1.0 M, which is in line with results in [31].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Thus, once the values of the diffusion coefficients of IrCl 3À 6 and IrCl 2À 6 have been obtained (see experimental section), we have determined the formal potential of the reversible system K 3 IrCl 6 5 mM þ KNO 3 0.25 M from the measurement of the peak potential, according to Equation 2.1 in Table 2, obtaining the value E8' IrCl 3À 6 /IrCl 2À 6 ¼ 0.710 AE 0.002 V (vs. Ag/ AgCl/KCl 1.0 M), which is in good agreement with that reported in the literature [28]. On the other hand, we have used Equations 2.3 -2.4 in Table 2 for the dI/dE vs. E curves to obtain the charge transfer coefficient and the heterogeneous rate constant of the Fe 3þ reduction in HClO 4 media, once the values of the diffusion coefficient of oxidized species and the formal potential of the electroactive couple are known (see experimental section).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The mean peak separation (DE) calculated across all laboratories (level 3) was measured to be 101 mV. Since a reversible single electron reaction is theoretically 59 mV, and because similar peak separation values have been reported elsewhere [14], our measured mean value is considered reasonable. However, if one looks at the 5 th CV cycle of randomly selected trials from each laboratory (Fig.…”
Section: Gc Electrode Surface Quality Checkmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other end, it was packed with carbon paste to about 2 mm depth from the liquid interface. The surface of carbon paste was smoothed on a weighing paper for the MCPE, and the surface area of 0.12 cm 2 was calculated based on Randle-Sevcik equation [35]. One hundred mg of nanosized Fe 3 O 4 particles were dispersed in 10 mL ethanol under ultrasonication for 30 min.…”
Section: Electrode Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyclic voltammetry can provide information on changes of electrode surfaces during modification processes. was calculated for the prepared MCPE/MNP electrode, using the Randle Sevcik equation [35]. By comparison of the surface area of the MCPE/MNP (0.26 cm 2 ) with the MCPE (0.12 cm 2 ), it is indicated that the increased faradaic current of the MCPE/MNP may be due to presence of nanometer sized Fe 3 O 4 particles on the electrode surface (compare curves (A) and (B) in Figure 2(a)).…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterization Of the Mcpe/mnpmentioning
confidence: 99%