2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclin and protamine as prognostic molecular marker for testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, expression levels of these 4 molecular markers were significantly associated with histological findings of testicular biopsy specimens; that is, VASA, ODF1, ODF2, and SMCP expressions in SCO were markedly down‐regulated compared with those in either MA or HS. We also previously reported that the cyclin A1, cyclin B1, cyclin B2, protamine‐1, and protamine‐2 mRNA transcript ratios were significantly decreased in patients with failed sperm retrieval by micro‐TESE compared with those with successful sperm retrieval (Haraguchi et al, 2009). Collectively, these findings strongly suggest that assessment of the expression profile of potential molecular markers playing important roles in spermatogenesis could be used as a useful adjunct to conventional parameters for differentiating successful from unsuccessful groups undergoing micro‐TESE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Additionally, expression levels of these 4 molecular markers were significantly associated with histological findings of testicular biopsy specimens; that is, VASA, ODF1, ODF2, and SMCP expressions in SCO were markedly down‐regulated compared with those in either MA or HS. We also previously reported that the cyclin A1, cyclin B1, cyclin B2, protamine‐1, and protamine‐2 mRNA transcript ratios were significantly decreased in patients with failed sperm retrieval by micro‐TESE compared with those with successful sperm retrieval (Haraguchi et al, 2009). Collectively, these findings strongly suggest that assessment of the expression profile of potential molecular markers playing important roles in spermatogenesis could be used as a useful adjunct to conventional parameters for differentiating successful from unsuccessful groups undergoing micro‐TESE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We showed that several proposed markers; however, no one could foretell about the presence of a spermatogenic focus inside an NOA testis regarding TESE/ICSI processes (13). The invasive examination, such as testicular biopsy, may cause inflammatory changes, hematoma, parenchymal fibrosis, or permanent devascularization of the testes (14, 15) and does not determine whether sperm are present elsewhere in the testis without good molecular markers at present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Among them, HORMAD2 is known to be essential during meiotic prophase19, while CCNA1 is a meiosis-specific cyclin required for meiosis I in testicular germ epithelium20. The relative abundance of CCNA1 transcript was reported to be lower in patients with severe defects of sperm production20. Network analysis identified another key gene, EZH2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%