2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cycling degradation of an automotive LiFePO4 lithium-ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
182
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
182
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This experiment shows an external pressure of 0.8 bar leads to a capacity reduction of 2% at 25 0 C and 4% at 0 0 C. The shape of the discharge voltage remains unchanged except at the beginning and end of discharge period; it is similar for all three temperatures. From these results it can be said that there is no change of voltage plateau of cathode and graphite anode due to external pressure [8]. However, external pressure does change the capacity of the cell which happens at the last portion of the discharge period.…”
Section: A2 -Charging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This experiment shows an external pressure of 0.8 bar leads to a capacity reduction of 2% at 25 0 C and 4% at 0 0 C. The shape of the discharge voltage remains unchanged except at the beginning and end of discharge period; it is similar for all three temperatures. From these results it can be said that there is no change of voltage plateau of cathode and graphite anode due to external pressure [8]. However, external pressure does change the capacity of the cell which happens at the last portion of the discharge period.…”
Section: A2 -Charging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The latter generally result in an increase in activation energy due to an increase in the thickness of the SEI layer on the anode. Thus Zhang et al [39] have reported an activation energy of 4.3 kJ mol -1 for a fresh battery utilising a LiFePO 4 cathode; this increased to 20.9 kJ mol -1 after 300 cycles. However, an activation energy of 3.6 kJ mol -1 for a battery employing a LiNiO 2 cathode has also been reported [40], which decreased to 2.4 kJ mol -1 after 5250 cycles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, in 'With V2G' scenario, the SoC of this vehicle battery changes within a wider range in comparison to the 'Without V2G' scenario as the EV is being controlled to discharge the energy stored in its batteries back to the grid in some occasions. This extra fluctuation of the SoC of the batteries due to participating in V2G scheme could potentially degrade the performance of batteries as discussed in [20][21][22][23]. This issue will be investigated in future work with an attempt to optimize the profit gained from V2G participation of these EVs.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%