2017
DOI: 10.1111/ner.12610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suspected loss of CMS efficacy over time could be explained by a tolerance phenomenon. 12,20,21 Some of the strategies proposed to address this effect are cyclization programing, 16,22,23 setting the amplitude at 60% of the motor threshold, 16 and patient hospitalization to perform an intensive reprograming session. 23 Regarding the biological mechanisms of action, cathodal stimulation of the motor cortex could activate cortical interneurons, which indirectly trigger descending pathways to the thalamus and spinal cord.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suspected loss of CMS efficacy over time could be explained by a tolerance phenomenon. 12,20,21 Some of the strategies proposed to address this effect are cyclization programing, 16,22,23 setting the amplitude at 60% of the motor threshold, 16 and patient hospitalization to perform an intensive reprograming session. 23 Regarding the biological mechanisms of action, cathodal stimulation of the motor cortex could activate cortical interneurons, which indirectly trigger descending pathways to the thalamus and spinal cord.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspected loss of CMS efficacy over time could be explained by a tolerance phenomenon. 12,20,21 Some of the strategies proposed to address this effect are cyclization programing, 16,22,23 setting the amplitude at 60% of the motor threshold, 16 and patient hospitalization to perform an intensive reprograming session. 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, programming MCS is difficult, mainly because it usually takes several days before the patients feel any change after the setting was modified. For example, the authors report in this paper that "patients typically began to feel the ill effects of an ineffective cyclized setting approximately three days after the setting was changed" (1). Exceptionally, some patients may have an ON/ OFF effect, that is, an almost immediate clinical response to MCS (2).…”
Section: Place Of Cyclization Mode In the Adjustment Of Parameters Fomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We read with great interest the publication by Ivanishvili et al (1) entitled "Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial", published in Neuromodulation, which reports a series of six patients who were successfully treated for neuropathic pain by motor cortex stimulation (MCS) using a continuous mode of stimulation (1). The goal of the study was to investigate whether a cyclic mode for MCS therapy could be as effective as a continuous mode in a prospective, randomized, blinded trial.…”
Section: Place Of Cyclization Mode In the Adjustment Of Parameters Fomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar studies have not been extended into the perioperative setting, but numerous studies have established the role of TMS and fMRI data as biomarkers to predict motor recovery following stroke, warranting further investigation following neuro-oncological resection [46,47]. Lastly, interventional neurorehabilitation can also be utilised in other patient populations following stroke-induced pain or movement disorders [48][49][50] With rising open science and international collaborative efforts, prospective registrybased clinical studies could be employed to overcome heterogeneous glioma populations and derive more practical outcomes.…”
Section: Future Directions For Interventional Neurorehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%