2019
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.28543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclosporine A improves pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and elevated Th1/Th2 ratio

Abstract: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a one of the most common obstetrical complications. Since, the successful pregnancy occurs in T helper 2 (Th2)‐dominant situation and since, Th1 type immunity is related to pregnancy failure, we investigated the effects of cyclosporine on Th1 and Th2 cells in RPL women. Totally, 76 RPL patients (38 women as treated group and 38 as control group) were included in this study. Flow cytometry was utilized to analyze the frequency of Th1 and Th2 in blood samples. Also, real‐time po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall alternation of all immunological parameters among the three groups was shown in Figure 1B. Previous studies reported that CD4 + T cells biased to Th2 and/or Treg cells, focusing mainly on the Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg balance, promote the development of normal pregnancy (26)(27)(28). Although recent advances in reproductive immunology have expanded the Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg paradigm to the Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/follicular T helper (Tfh) paradigm ( 29), this could not uncover the whole knowledge of the immunological factors in RPL.…”
Section: Significantly Changed Immune Parameters Related To Rplmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The overall alternation of all immunological parameters among the three groups was shown in Figure 1B. Previous studies reported that CD4 + T cells biased to Th2 and/or Treg cells, focusing mainly on the Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg balance, promote the development of normal pregnancy (26)(27)(28). Although recent advances in reproductive immunology have expanded the Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg paradigm to the Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17/Th22/follicular T helper (Tfh) paradigm ( 29), this could not uncover the whole knowledge of the immunological factors in RPL.…”
Section: Significantly Changed Immune Parameters Related To Rplmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although only eight women had a high Th1/Th2 cell ratio (>11.8, average +1SD), seven women (87.5%) including three with an abnormally elevated Th1/Th2 cell ratio (>15.3, average +2SD) conceived and had babies without any immune modulation therapy. According to previous reports, no RIF women with high Th1/Th2 cell ratios achieved a pregnancy without immunotherapy and livebirth rates in the RPL women with high Th1/Th2 cell ratios were only 40%‐45% 12,19,20 . Therefore, Th cell testing and immunological therapy may not be necessary in general infertile women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Successful pregnancy requires a balance of pro‐ and anti‐inflammation‐related cytokines, which are secreted by Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively, with the importance initially of pro‐inflammatory cytokines, subsequent regulation by T regulatory cells via HLA and soluble hCG and then a Th2 dominance 10,11 . There is insufficient evidence on the modulation of an imbalanced Th1/Th2 cell ratio for RIF and RPL 14 ; however, therapeutic effects of optimizing the Th1/Th2 cell imbalance via immunotherapy have been reported in patients with a history of RIF and RPL 12,15–21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An appropriate dose of CsA (from 80 ng/ml to 150 ng/ ml) produces good curative effects and, in pregnancy, is used to treat immunity-related recurrent spontaneous abortion [23]. A low-dose CsA (150 mg/day) treatment for 6 months improves pregnancy outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and an elevated Th1/Th2 ratio [24]. Low-dose CsA (100 mg/day) treatment for 30 days increases the live birth rate for women with unexplained recurrent abortion, and it produces no obvious side effects or adverse consequences [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%