2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclosporine A in Reperfused Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: In the CYCLE (CYCLosporinE A in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, a single intravenous CsA bolus just before primary percutaneous coronary intervention had no effect on ST-segment resolution or hs-cTnT, and did not improve clinical outcomes or LV remodeling up to 6 months. (CYCLosporinE A in Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction [CYCLE]; NCT01650662; EudraCT number 2011-002876-18).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 Therefore, rat IRI results may not directly extrapolate to human IRI. However, previous experimental studies strongly suggest the usefulness of CysA for IRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 Therefore, rat IRI results may not directly extrapolate to human IRI. However, previous experimental studies strongly suggest the usefulness of CysA for IRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, also the cardioprotection by cyclosporine A which had been shown in a small-scale proof-of-concept trial 223 was not confirmed in another smaller study with prethrombolytic cyclosporine A 224 and, importantly, not in 2 larger-scale phase III trials, Does Cyclosporine Improve Clinical Outcome in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients (CIRCUS) and CyclosporinE A in Reperfused Myocardial Infarct (CYCLE). 225,226 Many potential reasons for this discrepancy have been discussed, such as lack of direct stenting and greater use of P2Y 12 antagonists, and also the use of a different vehicle in CIRCUS, but not in CYCLE. 227 In some of these studies, not only infarct size but also parameters reflecting coronary microvascular function were reported, and the effects of cardioprotective drugs on infarct size and coronary microvascular function were mostly concordant (Figures 5-8).…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Although there are several positive proof-of-concept studies for each of the conditioning phenomena, no phase III study has yet reported a better clinical outcome as the primary end point. With the neutral results of 2 recent phase III trial in cardiosurgical patients, that is, ERICCA (Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in CAGB Surgery) 37 and RIPHeart (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Heart Surgery), 38 and also a number of recent neutral trials which used drugs to recruit signaling steps of the conditioning phenomena in patients with AMI, that is, CIRCUS (Does Cyclosporine Improve Clinical Outcome in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients) 39 and CYCLE (Cyclosporine A in Reperfused Myocardial Infarction), 40 disappointment and frustration prevail.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%