2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: are there differences in nephrotoxicity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the longer-term CNIs cause chronic non-reversible changes that are characterised by interstitial fibrosis and obliterative arteriolar changes due to fibrous intimal thickening [90]. Although both cyclosporine and tacrolimus are nephrotoxic, recent studies suggest this may be less of a problem with tacrolimus [89,91,92]. Hypertension is a common consequence of CNI treatment, in part secondary to the renal effect [93] and again may be less common with tacrolimus.…”
Section: Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the longer-term CNIs cause chronic non-reversible changes that are characterised by interstitial fibrosis and obliterative arteriolar changes due to fibrous intimal thickening [90]. Although both cyclosporine and tacrolimus are nephrotoxic, recent studies suggest this may be less of a problem with tacrolimus [89,91,92]. Hypertension is a common consequence of CNI treatment, in part secondary to the renal effect [93] and again may be less common with tacrolimus.…”
Section: Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2324] Although early reports in transplant recipients supported these findings,[2526] a recent meta-analysis showed that the risk of nephrotoxicity in transplant allografts was similar for CyA and tacrolimus. [27] Although there are no comparative reports, the present retrospective review did not show differences in histological changes and proportion of patients with nephrotoxicity following therapy with either agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both one-and two-compartment models with or without a lag time and first-order absorption and elimination were compared in this study [20][21][22]. Typical value of the absorption rate constant (Ka) could not be estimated because of the lack of concentration data in absorption and distribution phase.…”
Section: Structural Model Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%